1 / 5

2009-7 Open Access to IPv6

2009-7 Open Access to IPv6. Shepherds: Cathy Aronson, Owen Delong. Policy Statements. Modifies existing IPv6 Policy Remove “by advertising that connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation” from article 3 of section 6.5.1.1

christmas
Télécharger la présentation

2009-7 Open Access to IPv6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009-7 Open Access to IPv6 Shepherds: Cathy Aronson, Owen Delong

  2. Policy Statements • Modifies existing IPv6 Policy • Remove “by advertising that connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation” from article 3 of section 6.5.1.1 • Remove article 4 of section 6.5.1.1, be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for making at least 200 end-site assignments to other organizations within 5 years in its entirety.

  3. Rationale • It is acknowledged that these concepts have been put before the community in the past. However, with the wisdom of actual operational experience, the necessity of promoting IPv6 adoption throughout our region, and emerging native v6 only network models, it becomes obvious that these modifications to the NRPM are necessary. Removing the 200 end site requirement enables smaller, but no less important and viable, networks access to IPv6. Removing the known ISP requirement enfranchises new, native v6 businesses that can drive innovation and expansion in the Internet industry, as well as other industries. Removing the requirement for a single aggregate announcement benefits the NRPM itself, as it has been decided by the community that it should not contain routing advice.

  4. Pros • Promotes IPv6 adoption • Facilitates innovation and progress • Currently can’t announce more specifics for traffic engineering • Current policy doesn’t allow for more specifics for anycast • Current policy doesn’t allow for more specifics for hijacked /32s

  5. Cons • Routing table growth

More Related