1 / 5

Stable chargino

Stable chargino. Direi che siamo compatibili con la selezione 1 candidato Tight di Troels &co a 500 GeV , see next. La grossa differenza la fa il trigger, immagino che potremmo ampliarla anche noi volendo. Metastable. Same cuts as stable and as Rhadrons analysis

chynna
Télécharger la présentation

Stable chargino

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stable chargino Direichesiamocompatibili con la selezione 1 candidato Tight di Troels &co a 500 GeV, see next. La grossadifferenza la fail trigger, immaginochepotremmoampliarlaanchenoivolendo.

  2. Metastable • Same cuts as stable and as Rhadrons analysis • A partiredalle squeezed, troviamo 1.6 e 2.9% per 150 e 300 GeV , 1 ns lifetime

  3. Metastable da non filtered • Solo 150 GeV, 1 ns, ma siccomel’efficienzavieneuguale a prima (dovrebbeesserecambiato solo il cleaning) , possiamoassumereeff 3% sul 300 GeV.

  4. Confronto con Susy kinked (Shimpei) Signal: 150 GeV, 1 ns Event selection: 5.5% vs62.3% Track selection:15.4% vs 2.7% Overall: 0.85% vs1.7% Kinked selection is more efficient at the track level, but it is penalized by the event cuts. (btw, alloraandrebbeallagrande con FTK chetoglieil bias di evento)

More Related