html5-img
1 / 8

NDIA PMSC

NDIA PMSC. Scheduling Working Group. Exploratory working group. Objective Brainstorm and explore concerns and issues in scheduling bring them to entire PMSC Recommend further effort (with a definitive scope) (or recommend disbanding)

ciel
Télécharger la présentation

NDIA PMSC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NDIA PMSC Scheduling Working Group

  2. Exploratory working group • Objective • Brainstorm and explore concerns and issues in scheduling bring them to entire PMSC • Recommend further effort (with a definitive scope) (or recommend disbanding) • Definitive scope of further effort may be a guide, paper or other product to address scheduling

  3. Team Composition and Methodology • Team Members: • Team Lead David Treacy MCR Federal, LLC • David Roberts - KPMG • Michael Dahlberg – AJM Project Management Group • Roderick Brooks – Pratt Whitney • Tiffany Brunetti-Clymer – Battelle • Timothy Covington - General Dynamics • DCMA (David Kester) expressed interest, but was unable to attend any of the telecons • Methodology • 3 telecons (September, November, January) • Unconstrained discussion • Covered entire scheduling domain • Captured concerns and thoughts

  4. Scheduling as an EVM Requirement • Concern that EVM is driver for scheduling rather than effective program and project management • Scheduling is a program management discipline with a defined purpose and objective in program and project management and does not exist merely to support EVM • Planning and scheduling functions should exist regardless of requirement/intent to implement EVM • EVM is the integration mechanism not the raison d’etre for scheduling

  5. Lack of Consistent Requirements • From both the customer base (civil and DOD) and internal to companies • Customers levy different requirements on companies • No universal government regulation for scheduling (DID can be negotiated in or out) • Implementation is on a contract basis rather than a FAR clause • Many agencies’ (primarily civilian) maturity level in scheduling is low

  6. No Common Source of Best Practices • Best practices exist in agencies and industry but are not generally known outside those industries or agencies • Examples: • Should baseline be done to early vs late dates? • Who should status the schedule, the CAMs or the program control group • How often should risk assessment versus float management be done? • What is the appropriate Critical Path level? • How often should the schedule be updated?

  7. Implementation • Lack of integration of cost and schedule • Lack of a control mechanism in programs for schedules (similar to financial/budget control) (Program Control) results in wide variations in quality • Centralized control (Program Control) of schedule vs CAM or individual project control

  8. Recommendations • Conduct best practices /lessons learned study • Across industries (systems acquisition, construction, environmental cleanup, IT, Software, etc. • Within professional societies and academia, PMI College of Scheduling, Construction Industry Institute, DAU, FAI, others • Tools, methodologies, training, etc. • Determine appropriate outcome – database, repository of knowledge, bibliography • Seek partnership with PMI College of Scheduling, College of Performance Management, and DAU to conduct study

More Related