1 / 10

2010 Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Northeast Conference Wilson Rickerson May 19 th , 2010

The Story of Vermont’s Feed-in Tariff – Lessons Learned. 2010 Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Northeast Conference Wilson Rickerson May 19 th , 2010. To Feed-in or not to Feed-in?. Feed-in Tariffs around the World. 75% of global PV and 45% of global wind by 2008.

ciqala
Télécharger la présentation

2010 Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Northeast Conference Wilson Rickerson May 19 th , 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Story of Vermont’s Feed-in Tariff – Lessons Learned 2010 Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Northeast Conference Wilson Rickerson May 19th, 2010

  2. To Feed-in or not to Feed-in?

  3. Feed-in Tariffs around the World 75% of global PV and 45% of global wind by 2008

  4. Feed-in Tariffs in the US 2007-2010 Consumers Sacramento IP&L Los Angeles Palm Desert Santa Monica 4 States and 5 utilitieswith feed-in tariffs 16 States and 3 cities with legislation Gainesville San Antonio 9 states with regulatory initiatives

  5. US Projections ~270 MW of PV by 2016 Southern California Edison Standard Offer Contract: 140 MW of 20 MW PV plants Time-of-delivery rate (TOD), at ~$0.15/kWh SMUD (est. 100 MW) 100 MW of PV for building in 2012 @ ~$0.16/kWh (TOD rate) Recurrent, SunPower, Belectric, Globall Connect, McClellan Park are the winners Gainesville – PV only (est. 24 MW): $0.32/kWh for 20 years 3 MW in the ground by December 2009 Queue full through 2016 Consumers Energy (est. 2 MW) 2 MW program cap subscribed Green power programs: Wisconsin utilities buy-back programs 2.98 MW Tennessee Valley Authority – 300 kW to date

  6. Vermont in the Lead! • First state to pass feed-in tariff legislation based on generation cost • First detailed attempt to set feed-in tariff rates at the state using a public model • Hundreds of pages of useful data about distributed renewable energy project development and pricing • Policy targets technologies beyond PV

  7. Biogas in the US vs. Biogas in Germany

  8. Success? It depends on what you set out to do… • Create investor certainty? • Rapidly expand renewable energy capacity? • Make it easier for Vermonters to invest in renewables? • Support local industry? • Diversify the portfolio? • Minimize ratepayer impact?

  9. Is there a next time? • Support legislative language that reflects your objectives • Size differentiation • Interaction with grants and tax credits • Rapid growth vs. ratepayer impact • In-state manufacturing • Include evaluation metrics beyond ratepayer impact • Do all technologies need caps?

  10. Wilson Rickerson (617) 934-1676 wilson.rickerson@mc-group.com www.mc-group.com

More Related