1 / 53

Measuring correlation functions in interacting systems of cold atoms

Measuring correlation functions in interacting systems of cold atoms. Anatoli Polkovnikov Harvard/Boston University Ehud Altman Harvard/Weizmann Vladimir Gritsev Harvard Mikhail Lukin Harvard Luming Duan Michigan Vito Scarola Maryland

clark-estes
Télécharger la présentation

Measuring correlation functions in interacting systems of cold atoms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring correlation functions in interacting systems of cold atoms Anatoli PolkovnikovHarvard/Boston University Ehud AltmanHarvard/Weizmann Vladimir GritsevHarvard Mikhail LukinHarvard Luming Duan Michigan Vito Scarola Maryland Sankar Das Sarma Maryland Eugene DemlerHarvard Thanks to: J. Schmiedmayer, M. Oberthaler, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, M. Oshikawa, Z. Hadzibabic

  2. Bose-Einstein condensation Cornell et al., Science 269, 198 (1995) Ultralow density condensed matter system Interactions are weak and can be described theoretically from first principles

  3. New Era in Cold Atoms Research Focus on Systems with Strong Interactions • Optical lattices • Feshbach resonances • Rotating systems • Low dimensional systems • Systems with long range dipolar interactions • (magnetic dipolar interactions for atoms, • electric dipolar interactions for molecules)

  4. Atoms in optical lattices Theory: Jaksch et al. PRL (1998) Experiment: Kasevich et al., Science (2001); Greiner et al., Nature (2001); Phillips et al., J. Physics B (2002) Esslinger et al., PRL (2004);

  5. Feshbach resonance and fermionic condensates Greiner et al., Nature 426:537 (2003); Ketterle et al., PRL 91:250401 (2003) Ketterle et al., Nature 435, 1047-1051 (2005)

  6. One dimensional systems 1D confinement in optical potential Weiss et al., Science (05); Bloch et al., Esslinger et al., One dimensional systems in microtraps. Thywissen et al., Eur. J. Phys. D. (99); Hansel et al., Nature (01); Folman et al., Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. (02) Strongly interacting regime can be reached for low densities

  7. New Era in Cold Atoms Research Focus on Systems with Strong Interactions Goals • Resolve long standing questions in condensed matter physics • (e.g. origin of high temperature superconductivity) • Resolve matter of principle questions • (e.g. existence of spin liquids in two and three dimensions) • Study new phenomena in strongly correlated systems • (e.g. coherent far from equilibrium dynamics)

  8. This talk: Detection of many-body quantum phases by measuring correlation functions

  9. Outline Measuring correlation functions inintereferenceexperiments 1. Interference of independent condensates 2. Interference of interacting 1Dsystems 3. Interference of 2D systems 4. Full counting statistics of intereference experiments. Connection to quantum impurity problem Quantum noiseinterferometryin time of flight experiments 1. Detection of magnetically ordered Mott states in optical lattices 2. Observation of fermion pairing

  10. Measuring correlation functions in intereference experiments

  11. Interference of two independent condensates Andrews et al., Science 275:637 (1997)

  12. Interference of two independent condensates r’ r 1 r+d d 2 Clouds 1 and 2 do not have a well defined phase difference. However each individual measurement shows an interference pattern

  13. x y Interference of one dimensional condensates Experiments: Schmiedmayer et al., Nature Physics 1 (05) d Amplitude of interference fringes, , contains information about phase fluctuations within individual condensates x1 x2

  14. L Interference amplitude and correlations Polkovnikov, Altman, Demler,cond-mat/0511675 For identical condensates Instantaneous correlation function

  15. L For non-interacting bosons and For impenetrable bosons and Analysis of can be used for thermometry Interference between Luttinger liquids Luttinger liquid at T=0 K – Luttinger parameter Luttinger liquid at finite temperature

  16. For large imaging angle, , Rotated probe beam experiment Luttinger parameter K may be extracted from the angular dependence of q

  17. Interference between two-dimensional BECs at finite temperature. Kosteritz-Thouless transition

  18. Ly Lx Lx Interference of two dimensional condensates Experiments: Stock, Hadzibabic, Dalibard, et al., cond-mat/0506559 Gati, Oberthaler, et al., cond-mat/0601392 Probe beam parallel to the plane of the condensates

  19. Ly Lx Below KT transition Above KT transition Interference of two dimensional condensates.Quasi long range order and the KT transition Theory: Polkovnikov, Altman, Demler, cond-mat/0511675

  20. Experiments with 2D Bose gas low temperature higher temperature Haddzibabic, Stock, Dalibard, et al. Time of flight z x Typical interference patterns

  21. Experiments with 2D Bose gas Haddzibabic, Stock, Dalibard, et al. Contrast after integration integration over x axis z 0.4 low T z middle T 0.2 integration over x axis high T z 0 0 Dx 10 20 30 integration distance Dx (pixels) x integration over x axis z

  22. Experiments with 2D Bose gas Haddzibabic, Stock, Dalibard, et al. 0.4 low T 0.2 Exponent a middle T 0 0 10 20 30 high T if g1(r) decays exponentially with : high T low T 0.5 0.4 if g1(r) decays algebraically or exponentially with a large : central contrast 0.3 “Sudden” jump!? 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 fit by: Integrated contrast integration distance Dx

  23. Experiments with 2D Bose gas Haddzibabic, Stock, Dalibard, et al. c.f. Bishop and Reppy 0.5 1.0 0.4 T (K) 0 1.1 1.0 1.2 0.3 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Exponent a high T low T central contrast Ultracold atoms experiments: jump in the correlation function. KT theory predicts a=1/4 just below the transition He experiments: universal jump in the superfluid density

  24. 30% Exponent a 20% 10% low T high T 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 central contrast 0.5 central contrast 0.4 The onset of proliferation coincides with ashifting to 0.5! 0.3 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Experiments with 2D Bose gas. Proliferation of thermal vortices Haddzibabic, Stock, Dalibard, et al. Fraction of images showing at least one dislocation Z. Hadzibabic et al., in preparation

  25. Rapidly rotating two dimensional condensates Time of flight experiments with rotating condensates correspond to density measurements Interference experiments measure single particle correlation functions in the rotating frame

  26. Full counting statistics of interference between two interacting one dimensional Bose liquids Gritsev, Altman, Demler, Polkovnikov, cond-mat/0602475

  27. L Explicit expressions for are available but cumbersome Fendley, Lesage, Saleur, J. Stat. Phys. 79:799 (1995) Higher moments of interference amplitude is a quantum operator. The measured value of will fluctuate from shot to shot. Can we predict the distribution function of ? Higher moments Changing to periodic boundary conditions (long condensates)

  28. Impurity in a Luttinger liquid Expansion of the partition function in powers of g Partition function of the impurity contains correlation functions taken at the same point and at different times. Moments of interference experiments come from correlations functions taken at the same time but in different points. Euclidean invariance ensures that the two are the same

  29. Distribution function can be reconstructed from using completeness relations for the Bessel functions Relation between quantum impurity problemand interference of fluctuating condensates Normalized amplitude of interference fringes Distribution function of fringe amplitudes Relation to the impurity partition function

  30. is related to a Schroedinger equation Dorey, Tateo, J.Phys. A. Math. Gen. 32:L419 (1999) Bazhanov, Lukyanov, Zamolodchikov, J. Stat. Phys. 102:567 (2001) Spectral determinant can be obtained from the Bethe ansatz following Zamolodchikov, Phys. Lett. B 253:391 (91); Fendley, et al., J. Stat. Phys. 79:799 (95) Making analytic continuation is possible but cumbersome Bethe ansatz solution for a quantum impurity Interference amplitude and spectral determinant

  31. Evolution of the distribution function Narrow distribution for . Distribution width approaches Wide Poissonian distribution for

  32. correspond to vacuum eigenvalues of Q operators of CFT Bazhanov, Lukyanov, Zamolodchikov, Comm. Math. Phys.1996, 1997, 1999 2D quantum gravity, non-intersecting loops on 2D lattice Yang-Lee singularity From interference amplitudes to conformal field theories When K>1, is related to Q operators of CFT with c<0. This includes 2D quantum gravity, non-intersecting loop model on 2D lattice, growth of random fractal stochastic interface, high energy limit of multicolor QCD, …

  33. Quantum noise interferometry in time of flight experiments

  34. Mott insulator Superfluid t/U Atoms in an optical lattice.Superfluid to Insulator transition Greiner et al., Nature 415:39 (2002)

  35. Time of flight experiments Quantum noise interferometry of atoms in an optical lattice Second order coherence

  36. Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment Theory: Altman et al., PRA 70:13603 (2004) Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005)

  37. Hanburry-Brown-Twiss stellarinterferometer

  38. Bosons at quasimomentum expand as plane waves with wavevectors Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons First order coherence: Oscillations in density disappear after summing over Second order coherence: Correlation function acquires oscillations at reciprocal lattice vectors

  39. Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment Theory: Altman et al., PRA 70:13603 (2004) Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005)

  40. Effect of parabolic potential on the second order coherence Experiment: Spielman, Porto, et al., Theory: Scarola, Das Sarma, Demler, cond-mat/0602319 Width of the correlation peak changes across the Transition, reflecting the evolution of the Mott domains

  41. Interference of an array of independent condensates Hadzibabic et al., PRL 93:180403 (2004) Smooth structure is a result of finite experimental resolution (filtering)

  42. Applications of quantum noise interferometry Spin order in Mott states of atomic mixtures

  43. t t Two component Bose mixture in optical lattice Example: . Mandel et al., Nature 425:937 (2003) Two component Bose Hubbard model

  44. Two component Bose mixture in optical lattice.Magnetic order in an insulating phase Insulating phases with N=1 atom per site. Average densities Easy plane ferromagnet Easy axis antiferromagnet

  45. Quantum magnetism of bosons in optical lattices Kuklov and Svistunov, PRL (2003) • Ferromagnetic • Antiferromagnetic Duan, Lukin, Demler, PRL (2003)

  46. Probing spin order of bosons Correlation Function Measurements Extra Bragg peaks appear in the second order correlation function in the AF phase

  47. Applications of quantum noise interferometry Detection of fermion pairing

  48. Fermions with repulsive interactions U t t Possible d-wave pairing of fermions

  49. Positive U Hubbard model Possible phase diagram. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250:329 (1995) Antiferromagnetic insulator D-wave pairing of fermions

  50. n(r’) k F n(r) Second order interference from a BCS superfluid n(k) k BCS BEC

More Related