1 / 13

Personalized budgets and direct payments

Personalized budgets and direct payments. Conference Sofia May 2007. Aspects. First ideas and first reactions Payment and bottlenecks Positions and discussions Stake-holders views Accepted models Perspectives. First ideas and first reactions. Panacea Threat Black economy

claude
Télécharger la présentation

Personalized budgets and direct payments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personalized budgets and direct payments Conference Sofia May 2007

  2. Aspects • First ideas and first reactions • Payment and bottlenecks • Positions and discussions • Stake-holders views • Accepted models • Perspectives

  3. First ideas and first reactions • Panacea • Threat • Black economy • Grandma in the coal-shed • Unemployment • Overspending • Cost-reduction

  4. Payments and bottlenecks(1) • Services paid by governments • Part of social security • Based on: bed, place • Three parties: user, provider, third paying • Own contribution • Limited or no influence

  5. Payment and bottlenecks (2) • Paradigm changes to be cashed • Specialised services • Differentiation • One bed: 15 users • Increasing special needs • Governments stepping back • Market-orientation

  6. positions • No patronizing • Jetzt entscheide ich selbst • I am the boss • Wie betaalt bepaalt • The might is the right • Avoir c’s pouvoir

  7. Discussions • No doubt about the paradigm • Equal rights and participation accepted • But what about the consequences • Are we ready for changing the system

  8. Stake-holders (1) Service providers: • We know what is needed • Mission impossible • Complicated • Not a free market • Users capable? • Staff?

  9. Stake-holders (2) Governement: • Support service-users • Market • Black money • Employment • Cost-reduction

  10. Accepted models • Own budget • Voucher system • In natura • Payment on the basis of assessment • Care weight as basis • Integration budget

  11. Perspectives • Accepted as consequences of the paradigm change • Increasing interest from all stake-holders • Challenging providers

  12. Perspectvies • Inclusive services • Service providers as specialist • Special attention for special needs • Increasing number of participants • With drawing governments • More market regulation

  13. EASPD Av. d’Auderghem 63 / Oudergemlaan B – 1000 Brussels Tel +32 2 282 46 10 – Fax +32 2 230 72 33 www.easpd.org - info@easpd.be

More Related