1 / 19

EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN ECE: SOME DETERMINANTS

EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN ECE: SOME DETERMINANTS. Presented By: Preeti Mahalwal. Overview of Presentation. Context. The RTE(2009) commits to free and compulsory elementary education for every child between 6 -14 years of age. High dropout rates , particularly in Grade 1 and 2

cleary
Télécharger la présentation

EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN ECE: SOME DETERMINANTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EFFECTIVE TEACHERS IN ECE: SOME DETERMINANTS Presented By: PreetiMahalwal

  2. Overview of Presentation

  3. Context • The RTE(2009) commits to free and compulsory elementary education for every child between 6 -14 years of age. • High dropout rates , particularly in Grade 1 and 2 • Vulnerability of children in the transition stage, from home/preschool to formal schools • Children with adequate school readiness skills and concepts have better chances of successfully transiting and adjusting to the formal schools • In this context, a longitudinal study entitled “Impact of Early learning, Socialization and School readiness experiences in preschool setting on educational and behavioral outcomes along the primary stage” is being carried out by CECED

  4. Background of the study The present study is part of the larger Longitudinal Study which is looking at: • Trends in participation in ECE across public, private & NGO sectors. • Quality variations in ECE across sector. • Impact of quality variations on school readiness of children at age 5 years. • Longer term impact of school readiness in terms of primary level outcomes –both cognitive and personal-social.

  5. Objectives • To study the trend of teacher disposition across various types of program. • To study the relationship between teacher related factors and teacher disposition. • To study the relationship between teacher disposition and quality of program.

  6. HYPOTHESIS • There is a significant correlation between teacher related factors and teacher disposition. • There is a significant correlation between teacher disposition and quality domains of program.

  7. Methodology • Mixed methodology • Observation - ECEQAS(Early Childhood Education Quality Assessment Scale) • Interview – Teacher Schedule • Field notes

  8. Conceptual Framework

  9. Teacher Disposition • It is being measured by one of the domain of ECEQAS(Early Childhood Education Quality Assessment Scale). It includes those behavior/attitude which requires her/him to be sensitive to: • Gender • Socially disadvantaged group such as tribal, SC and OBC • Needs of children with special need • Encouraging social interaction • Encouraging self expression

  10. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

  11. Trends of Teacher Disposition

  12. Relationship between teacher related factors and teacher disposition ** Correlation is significant at .01 level(2-tailed) * Correlation is significant at .05 level(2-tailed)

  13. Does nature and quality of training matter? • Recurrent training • Onsite support • Regular mentoring • Monitoring ** Correlation is significant at .01 level(2-tailed) * Correlation is significant at .05 level(2-tailed)

  14. Relationship between Teacher disposition and domains of quality ** Correlation is significant at .01 level(2-tailed) * Correlation is significant at .05 level(2-tailed)

  15. Concluding Findings • Known practices are faring better than other programs • Training has an influence on teacher disposition • Nature and quality of training matters • Teacher disposition has influence on quality of program

  16. Limitations • Onlyfew aspects of teacher disposition are covered • Limited information on nature of training • Limited days of data collection

  17. Recommendations • All aspects of teacher disposition should be dealt in great detail • Teacher training in terms of its nature and quality should be studied in depth

  18. Acknowledgement • Funders: UNICEF, UNESCO, The World Bank, SERP, MHRD, MWCD, CARE India • State Research Partners: NIPCCD Guwahati & Andhra MahilaSabhaHyderabad • CECED Team Members: Prof. VenitaKaul, Dr. Monimalika Day, Mr. Sandipan, Ms. Aparajita, Ms. Devika, Ms. Shipra, Ms. Ruchi, Ms. Ridhi, Ms. Parul, Mr. SandeepandMs. Meenakshi

  19. THANKYOU!

More Related