Understanding the Literature on Problem Analysis
110 likes | 213 Vues
This presentation explores the critical importance of problem analysis in engineering, particularly focusing on the interplay between affect and cognitive processes in effective problem-solving. Highlighting how positive affect enhances creative problem-solving abilities, it draws on evidence from various studies, including the Duncker’s Candle Task and medical diagnostics. It also emphasizes the structural aspects of problem-solving, innovative frameworks, and the necessity for incorporating affective phases into engineering education. The insights provided aim to encourage practitioners to adopt these strategies for improved learning outcomes.
Understanding the Literature on Problem Analysis
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Understanding the Literature on Problem Analysis A look into the role of affect in problem solving frameworks • Albert HuynhCEEA 2014 - Canmore, Alberta
Why Problem Analysis? • Required as a CEAB Graduate Attribute • “Identify, formulate, analyze, and solve complex engineering problems” • One of the key takeaways of engineering education • “What do engineers do? Solve problems!” • Big problems to solve • 2
Performance = Cognition + AffectWe largely focus on the former • 3
Appropriate Affect Facilitates Problem Solving • Improved creative problem solving performance • Evidence from Duncker’s Candle Task and Remote Associates Test • Implications for mathematical problem solving • Studies on computational estimation • Potential for improved diagnostic ability • Shown through studies of medical diagnostic processing • Isen, A.M., Daubman, K.A. Nowicki, G.P., Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving. J. of Personality and Social Psych. 1987:52(6):1122McLeod D.B., Adams V.M. Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, Springer; 1989Young, M.J., Isen, A.M., Estrada, C.A., Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians, Org. Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1997:72(1):117-135 • 4
Problem Solving Structure • e.g. Ideation Methods, Decision Matrix • e.g. Self-reflection 5
McMaster Problem Solving (MPS) Strategy • Woods, DR., Problem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL, Woods, Waterdown, ON, 1994. 6
Frameworks of the Future • Acknowledge the need for affective phases • Identify appropriate tools for effective practice • Implementation and testing lies on practitioners of engineering education • 7
Further Reading • Affect and Problem Solving • McLeod, D.B., Adams, V.M. Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective • Problem Solving Frameworks • Woods, D.R. An evidence-based strategy for problem solving. J. for Engr. Educ. 2000:89(4):443-459 • McMaster Problem Solving Program • http://chemeng.mcmaster.ca/mcmaster-problem-solving-mps-program • 8
Thanks! Questions?Email: albert.huynh@utoronto.ca