1 / 8

Assessing Interpreter Utilization Patterns among Clinicians at Women and Infants’ Hospital

This study conducted at Women and Infants' Hospital aims to assess clinician utilization of interpreters for limited English proficiency (LEP) patients. Data analysis includes frequency of interpreter usage, clinician satisfaction, ethical considerations, and reasons for not using interpreters. Recommendations for improved services will be based on these findings.

clovis
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing Interpreter Utilization Patterns among Clinicians at Women and Infants’ Hospital

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing Interpreter Utilization Patterns among Clinicians at Women and Infants’ Hospital • Ben Brown, MD 2012 • Alpert Medical School of Brown University • nriAHEC Grantee, 2008-2009 • October 21, 2009

  2. Goals • Assess how often clinicians (primarily nurses and physicians) utilize interpreters • Assess how satisfied clinicians are with the interpretation options available to them • Use these data as the basis for policy recommendations to provide better services to limited English proficiency (LEP) patients

  3. Where we are now • Data collected (digitally and on paper) • Analysis underway: • How often clinicians see LEP patients, use interpreters • How satisfied they are with various interpretation methods • Knowledge of ethical issues involved in interpretation / care of LEP patients • Reasons why clinicians choose not to utilize an interprter • Assessing how profession, department, ability to speak other languages, training in LEP issues affect these variables

  4. In the last two weeks, approximately how many encounters have you had with adult limited English proficiency (LEP) patients? In approximately how many of these encounters did you utilize an ad hoc interpreter? In approximately how many of these encounters did you utilize a professional interpreter (from Interpreter Services or a telephone interpretation company)? In approximately how many of these encounters did you perform your duties without yourself speaking the patient’s language and without utilizing an interpreter of any kind?

  5. In general, when speaking with LEP patients through an interpreter, did you feel your patients accomplished what they set out to in your encounter? (n=133) In general, when speaking with LEP patients through an interpreter, did you feel you accomplished what you set out to in your encounter? (n=128)

  6. In general, when speaking with LEP patients without an interpreter, did you feel your patients accomplished what they set out to in your encounter? (n=104) In general, when speaking with LEP patients without an interpreter, did you feel you accomplished what you set out to in your encounter? (n=104)

  7. Who do you believe has the primary responsibility for ensuring that an interpreter is available when an LEP patient comes to seek care? (n=144)

  8. Thank You • Questions?

More Related