1 / 33

Academic Bullying: Practical Strategies for Faculty

Academic Bullying: Practical Strategies for Faculty . Mary Chavez Rudolph University of Colorado, Denver Mary.chavezrudolph@ucdenver.edu Thomas Sebok University of Colorado, Boulder Sebok@colorado.edu. Today’s Agenda. Student Incivility Factors that Affect Conflict Perceptions

cocheta
Télécharger la présentation

Academic Bullying: Practical Strategies for Faculty

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Academic Bullying: Practical Strategies for Faculty Mary Chavez Rudolph University of Colorado, Denver Mary.chavezrudolph@ucdenver.edu Thomas Sebok University of Colorado, Boulder Sebok@colorado.edu

  2. Today’s Agenda • Student Incivility • Factors that Affect Conflict • Perceptions • Emotion • Communication • Incivility in Academia • Faculty Incivility & Bullying • Interventions

  3. Student Incivility in the College Classroom • STUDENT INCIVILITY IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM FROM A FACULTY PERSPECTIVE: RACE AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION, ATTRIBUTION, EFFECT, AND RESPONSE Mary Chavez Rudolph, 2005 Doctoral Dissertation

  4. SI Behaviors (Amada, 1999) • sleeping in class • prolonged chattering • excessive lateness • poor personal hygiene • overt inattentiveness • eating, drinking, gum chewing, smoking • carrying pagers and beepers • passing notes • unexcused exits from class • verbal or physical threats to students or faculty • disputing the instructor’s authority and expertise

  5. Student Incivility (SI) Concern of Faculty and Administrators Incivility by one student or by many students has the potential to severely compromise the effectiveness of the classroom instruction and learning. “In related studies, where I tracked new faculty longer, these traumatic events (CI) [Classroom Incivility] and resulting impressions of undergraduates as adversaries were among the few early turning points that derailed careers.” (Boice, 1998)

  6. Causes of SI • Nature of Students • Student Mental Health • Consumer Attitude • Student Learning vs. Faculty Teaching • Nature of Society, the Classroom, the Course • Incivility in Society • Informality of Organizations • Large Classrooms

  7. Causes of SI (con’t.) • Instructor Behaviors • Increasing ethnic and gender diversity of students and instructors, and that SI and conflict is a reflection of cultural differences.

  8. Read Terry and Anna Case Study…Discuss with your neighbor… • What are the different perspectives of the parties in this situation? How does this affect this conflict? • How is emotion affecting this conflict? • How is communication affecting this conflict?

  9. Factors Affecting Conflict • Perceptions • Identity, History • Emotion • Communication

  10. Perceptions • “…conflict lies not in objective reality, but in people’s heads.” Fisher and Ury, 1991 • Check out Assumptions • Put yourself in their shoes • Ask / Discuss • Perceptual Errors

  11. Emotion • Emotion and (is) Motivation • Both move us in some way, as implied by the common Latin root of both words (movere, to move). Brian Parkinson and Andrew M. Colman, 1995 • Emotions are often precursors of motivational phenomena. Oatley, 1992 • “Emotion as Insight” Jones & Brinkert, 2008 • Managing Emotion

  12. Communication • Timing and Setting • Active Listening • Open-ended questions • I language • Limit-Setting • Issue Consequences

  13. Incivility in Academia DEFINING “INCIVILITY” • “Civility” – concern, regard, and respect “Behavior that helps to preserve the norms for mutual respect at work.” • “Incivility” – rudeness, disregard, and mistreatment Andersson and Wegner (2001)

  14. Incivility – Bullying - Violence • Norms for the organization erode • Spiraling and Cascading “Incivility goes unchecked and can escalate leading to a chain of more aggressive, coercive behaviors possibly leading to violence.” Pearson, Andersson, and Porath, 2000

  15. INCIVILITY IN ACADEMIA Unique Factors • Culture of Critique • Student Development • Tenure and Rewards for Faculty • Department Chair (Head) Role

  16. INCIVILITY IN ACADEMIA (cont’d.) Unique Factors • Funding • Free Speech/Academic Freedom • Free Speech/Right of Dissent • Conflict Avoidant Culture

  17. INCIVILITY IN ACADEMIA Not So Unique Factors • Physical Separation • External and Internal Customer Service Challenges • Evaluative Relationships • Peer/Colleague Relationships

  18. Read Case Study • Susan and George

  19. Workplace Bullying • Definition of Workplace Bullying: • Workplace Bullyingis repeated, health-harming mistreatment of one or more persons (the targets) by one or more perpetrators that takes the forms of: verbal abuse, offensive conduct/behaviors (including nonverbal) which are threatening, humiliating or intimidating, and/or work interference -- sabotage -- which prevents work from getting done. (Workplace Bullying Institute)

  20. Bullying Behaviors Threat to professional status (e.g., belittling opinion, public professional humiliation, accusation regarding lack of effort); Threat to personal standing (e.g., name-calling, insults, intimidation, devaluing with reference to age); Isolation (e.g., preventing access to opportunities, physical or social isolation, withholding of information); Overwork (e.g., undue pressure, impossible deadlines, unnecessary disruptions); Destabilization (e.g., failure to give credit when due, meaningless tasks, removal of responsibility, repeated reminders of blunders, setting up to fail). (Rayner, Charlotte, 1997)

  21. Bullies • 50% men / 50% women • 81% of bullies are bosses • 14% peers, or co-workers • 5% bully a higher ranking target Targets • Women are the majority of targets (3/4 of all) • Men bully women in 69% of the cases / women bully women 84% of the time

  22. Effects on the Target

  23. Why Do Individuals Fail to Act? • 42% of the cases - perpetrator’s immediate bosses directly helped the Bully or punished the complaining Target • 40% of the cases - Bullies’ managers did nothing to intervene (tacit support) • 32 % of the cases - HR supported the Bully or did nothing (51% of the cases) • 11% of the cases - the Target’s co-workers sided with the Bully • 7% of the cases - negative sanctions against the bully (censure, transfer, or termination)

  24. Relative Impunity United States • In the U.S. the law is attentive to harassment or discrimination when it relates to sex and race (Title VII). • U.S. Courts have consistently ruled that rude and even abusive behavior does not violate federal EEO laws unless it is directed at an individual (or group of individuals) because of his or her race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability. • The “equal opportunity harasser” defense.

  25. Interventions • Awareness raising • Policy or code - gives victims the confidence to seek redress and reduce the benefit/cost balance for those tempted to bully others • Anger and frustration management for bullies • Work w/individuals – assertiveness training, make changes in the structure (physical space, reporting, etc.), conflict management, mediation

  26. Bystanders Matter • Training to encourage intervention • Training to identify options for bystanders • Encourage the identification and discussion of unacceptable behavior

  27. Working with Individuals (Targets) • Goals and Interests • Strategies • Conflict Styles • Communication

  28. Goals & Interests • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs • Physiological • Security • Social • Esteem • Self-Actualization

  29. Strategies • Generate Options • Identify Pros and Cons • Evaluate Options based on Goals & Interests

  30. Conflict Styles • Most people have one or two preferred styles of responding to conflict • Thomas and Kilmann developed an instrument to help people determine their preferred style • Utilization of a particular style should be situation-dependent

  31. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode • Compete Collaborate • Compromise • Avoid Accommodate

  32. Proactive Strategies • How to set up an environment that is respectful or turn a disrespectful environment around… • What do you want? • What respectful behaviors do you want to increase? • 3-4 minutes brainstorms

  33. Questions…

More Related