Continuous Flow Intersection
Explore the benefits of Continuous Flow Intersections (CFI) as we discuss their advantages over traditional intersection designs. This informative session, held in March 2007, explains how CFI can enhance vehicular flow and reduce delays while offering substantial cost savings. With improved Level of Service (LOS) and increased capacity, CFIs are positioned as effective solutions for handling projected traffic volumes. We will also provide updates on permit statuses and answer any questions. Dive deep into how CFI can transform your traffic management approach.
Continuous Flow Intersection
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Continuous Flow Intersection March, 2007
Why are we here? • Discuss Continuous Flow Intersection compared to Standard Intersection • Update permit status • Answer your questions
CFI Benefits CFI is an at-grade design that provides comparable levels of vehicular flow to grade-separated interchanges at a fraction of the cost—and dramatic, long-term improvements over conventional at-grade approaches – ABMB Engineers
Benefits of CFI • Improved Level of Service (LOS) • Less Delay • Increased Capacity • More Mainline Green Time • Existing: 80 sec out of 150, 53% • Traditional: 54 sec out of 115, 47% • CFI: 74 sec out of 115, 64%
Benefits of CFI • Provides relief to entire system • 141 @ Gravois (MO 30) • 141 @ Gravois Bluffs • Overall LOS D reduced LOS C • Lower cost than grade separation • More consecutive movements
Level Of Service • Basically, average time each vehicle is stopped at a signal
Level Of Service - 2010 • Existing (current): • LOS C, Delay 24.6 sec/veh • Traditional • LOS D, Delay 35.4 sec/veh • CFI • LOS B, Delay 17.3 sec/veh
Level Of Service - 2030 • 25% Increase in Traffic • Traditional • LOS F, Delay 110.1 sec/veh • CFI • LOS C, Delay 29.5 sec/veh
Level Of Service - 2030 • WB PM Peak Hour - 2,890 veh/hr • Traditional • Delay 110.1 sec/veh => 88.4 hours • CFI • Delay 29.5 sec/veh => 23.7 hours
Consultant’s Conclusion “Both types of intersection configurations studied (continuous flow, dual lefts)…will provide the necessary capacity to accommodate the projected 2010 peak hour volumes. However, the dual left-turn lane concept would operated to LOS F during peak hours, whereas the continuous flow intersection concept would operate at LOS C during these hours. Therefore, the latter configuration would accommodate greater thru traffic volumes along Hwy 30 in the future.”
Questions? Contact Information: MoDOT Customer Service 1-888-ASK-MODOT