1 / 13

External Validity

External Validity. Are results obtained. here. r elevant here. Are results obtained from. These people. Relevant for these people. In general. Sometimes.

colby-palmer
Télécharger la présentation

External Validity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. External Validity

  2. Are results obtained here relevant here

  3. Are results obtained from These people Relevant for these people

  4. In general. Sometimes. In this class we are going to try and see whether results obtained in test scores in California, are valid in Massatucetts (or vice versa).

  5. Obtaining the data The data is online. You can load data into stata directly from the internet using the ‘use’ command. E.g. use http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/data/stockwatson/caschool, clear

  6. (a) Is it the same test? California sumtestscr Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- testscr | 420 654.1565 19.05335 605.55 706.75 Massachusetts sum totsc4 Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- totsc4 | 220 709.8273 15.12647 658 740

  7. (b) Do scores have a similar relationship with income? graph twoway scatter testscravginc, name(cal, replace) graph twoway scatter totsc4 percap, name(mass, replace) graph combine cal mass, cols(1)

  8. (c)

  9. Normalisation To compare the effect of class size on test scores we need to have a consistent measure of test scores. One way we can get closer to this is to normalise the scores by generating nts= (ts-mean(ts))/s.d.(ts) Now both sets of test scores will be on the same scale and so are more comparable. What are we implicitly assuming when we make this comparison?

  10. d) How similar are the effects of class size? External Validity?

  11. We can’t test whether the coefficients are statistically different. Unless… Suppose we run a pooled regression using data from California and Massachusetts (ignoring the other controls) nsti = b0 + b1(massdum) + b2 (classsize) + b3(massdum x classsize) + e

  12. Source | SS df MS Number of obs= 640 -------------+------------------------------ F( 3, 636) = 12.72 Model | 36.1088041 3 12.036268 Prob > F = 0.0000 Residual | 601.891166 636 .946369758 R-squared = 0.0566 -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.0521 Total | 637.99997 639 .998435008 Root MSE = .97282 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ tscore | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- tchratio | -.1196539 .0251215 -4.76 0.000 -.168985 -.0703228 massdum | -.3804042 .7076664 -0.54 0.591 -1.770049 1.009241 tch_massdum | .0060908 .0382728 0.16 0.874 -.0690655 .0812471 _cons | 2.350054 .495675 4.74 0.000 1.376696 3.323411 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  13. e) How similar are the effects of log income? External Validity?

More Related