1 / 15

Enhancing HIV/AIDS Coordination through Faith-Based Organizations in Uganda

This presentation explores the multi-sectoral coordination of HIV/AIDS responses in Uganda, emphasizing the critical roles played by Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs). It discusses the Uganda AIDS Commission's history, the evolution of self-coordinating entities, and the establishment of partnerships. Key strategies for effective coordination, including decentralized administration and stakeholder engagement, are highlighted. The presentation suggests that successful participation of all sectors is vital for improving service delivery and achieving the common goal of HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and support.

connie
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing HIV/AIDS Coordination through Faith-Based Organizations in Uganda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS:EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA AIDS COMMISSION ACET INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Entebbe –Uganda JAN 2005

  2. CONTEXT AND RATIONALE • Definition: Pooling efforts for a common goal • Purpose: Timely, efficient and equitable delivery of quality services • Imperative: Multi-sectoral approach, multiplicity • Structure and Location: UAC in the Presidency • Objective: To rally all sectors

  3. DEVOLVING COORDINATION TASKS • Evolution of coordination: Devolution of tasks through Partnership alignment into Self-Coordinating Entities (SCEs) • Decentralization of Administration, programmes and support

  4. UAC Mandate and role • Established by Statute of Parliament in 1992 to oversee, plan and coordinate the response to HIV/AIDS in Uganda; • Mandated to establish structures necessary to assist in the coordination function at various levels

  5. Coordination functions • Defining and supporting development of policies • Promoting leadership initiatives and advocacy • Leading strategic planning, M&E • Developing, Partnerships • Managing strategic information and knowledge • Supporting and promoting research • Mobilising resources and overseeing utilisation

  6. Uganda AIDS Partnership • Multi-sectoral coordination system • Supporting the coordination task of UAC • Rallies partners in all constituencies around common action • Support of strengthened coordination

  7. The Uganda AIDS Partnership Uganda AIDS Commission & Secretariat THE HIV/AIDS PARTNERSHIP COMMITTEE Media AIDS PARTNERSHIP FORUM Uganda HIV/AIDS Partnership UGANDA AIDS COMMISSION

  8. Uganda AIDS Partnership • Multi-sectoral coordination system supporting the coordination task of the Uganda AIDS Commission • Rallies partners of all constituencies around common action. • A Strategy in support of strengthened coordination

  9. AIDS Partnership structures at national level • Self-Coordinating Entities: SCEs Actors of same constituency e.g. young people • Ensure input into Partnership Committee • Share experiences/set up peer support mechanisms • Facilitate joint AIDS actions and collaboration with other SCEs • AIDS Partnership Committee • Representatives of 12 SCEs meet monthly, chaired by UAC • Sets agenda for the update, implementation and monitoring of the NSF • AIDS Partnership Forum • All implementing and funding partners meet annually • Review progress and set priorities for next year • AIDS Partnership Fund:to cover coordination costs of Partnership

  10. Strengths of the Partnership • Representatives selected, therefore accountable to their constituency • Stakeholders exchange ideas in democratic forum at same level as donors • Promotes transparency, consensus building, accountability, etc • Stakeholders take on responsibility to improve coordination • Beyond classic government/donor ‘partnerships”

  11. Decentralized Coordination • District coordination policy guideline developed in 2002 • Provides for 2 arms ( Policy / Political and Technical) • Executive/ Political : thrust on Advocacy for attention to HIV/AIDS issues, policy guidance, community mobilization, strategic direction, partnership development & social mobilization • Technical : Planning, monitoring activities and resources, information sharing

  12. SUCCESS FACTORS • Dialogue, open debate • Timely, accurate info. • Political involvement • Multisectorality • Flexible policies

  13. OPPORTUNITIES • FBOs well placed for prevention, care, impact mitigation • Global and national political goodwill • Alignment around “3 Ones” principles

  14. CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES • Pragmatism and tolerance • Further scale up • Constituency “self” coordination • Administrative decentralization • Resources: Effective utilization

  15. Conclusion & Recommendations • No one partner alone can scale up effectively • No effective coordination without participatory, representative and accountable system • Tools for improved coordination under exist • Shared responsibility to promote and practice • Openness, respect and honest will for participation is key for Partnership • Continued guidance and support be ensured

More Related