1 / 11

All-Party Parliamentary group on Science & Technology in Agriculture

All-Party Parliamentary group on Science & Technology in Agriculture. The challenges presented for Applied R&D, Within Agriculture & Horticulture. Where are the funding stream & facilities? Presented by: Neil Bragg Chair of HDC . Managing Horticulture within AHDB. Background to HDC.

connley
Télécharger la présentation

All-Party Parliamentary group on Science & Technology in Agriculture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. All-Party Parliamentary group on Science & Technology in Agriculture The challenges presented for Applied R&D, Within Agriculture & Horticulture. Where are the funding stream & facilities? Presented by: Neil Bragg Chair of HDC Managing Horticulture within AHDB

  2. Background to HDC • HDC started in 1986 • 300 crops and 35 Cropping associations- • Income – Approx £5million – • 90% spent on R&D • Through panels- • Field Veg, Top Fruit, Soft Fruit, Protected Edibles, Protected Ornamentals, Nursery stock, Bulbs and Cut flowers & Mushrooms

  3. Challenges for Applied research • National Horticultural Forum (NHF) Review of the provision of UK Horticultural R&D • Brian Jamieson et al Aug 2008 • Available on HDC & NFU websites

  4. Main Conclusions form the Jamieson review – no: 1 • This latter review clearly identified the challenges for the HDC in the light of the falling centralised funding of R&D and support for the existing R&D infrastructure in the UK. • By 2012, loss of all guarantee funds - £7-8 million per year?????

  5. Main Conclusions form the Jamieson review – no 2 • The report also identifies that there specific skills shortages specifically in basic areas of agronomy related to horticulture • See also the RASE report on Soils and water management • Age profiles of existing professionals

  6. Funding streams • Defra – Link – scattergun approach • Now disappearing ? • Go Sci – TSB – specific targets via Agri/food platform- • E.g. Crop Protection • What about ornamentals- life quality • BBSRC – Techno clubs 90% • EU – calls for concepts- HDC/SME’s • RDA’s – innovation in Business

  7. Physical resources then & now • Loss over the last twenty years • EHS’s. eg Lea Valley – 8 or 9 • GCRI, Long Ashton, Wellesbourne- • Kirton • Remaining: • Warwick HRI, EMR, STC, SCRI, • ADAS, NIAB, • Cranfield, Harper Adams • Universities

  8. Physical resources in 5 &10 years • EMR, STC, ADAS • Cranfield & Harper Adams • Universities at high level- Warwick, Lancs, York • EM Trust • Cranfield & Harper • Universities • ???????????????

  9. What is happening in other Countries? • Australia – HAL – matched funds • Denmark – Levy central collection – CA delivery- applied centres now part of Universities • Germany – Still centres in most regions • France – Astredhor- 14 substations • ROI – Teagasc- Student/Advise and R&D

  10. HDC initiatives • Encourage collaboration • Currently ADAS/EMR/STC working on HortLINK project/TSB submission • Seeking to get remaining expertise recognised and saved as mentor group • Set up strategic R&D groups • Look for the ‘impact’ of the science

  11. Challenges to the levy payers • Levy payers will have to work as a business development group? • Growers will have to accept levy being diverted into Strategic work areas? • Levy payers will have to support specific centres for applied research? • For discussion please

More Related