1 / 14

NEBs and the CJEU

This paper examines the significance of Non-Exhaustive Binding Obligations (NEBs) within the framework of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It discusses historical cases and the CJEU's role in ensuring uniform application of EU law, particularly through Article 267. Key cases such as Chacón Navas and Coleman illustrate the CJEU's regulatory and didactic functions, emphasizing its innovative role in extending legal protections. The paper aims to highlight how NEBs are becoming integral to the equality landscape and the importance of national courts' cooperation in this regard.

conor
Télécharger la présentation

NEBs and the CJEU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NEBs and the CJEU ROBIN ALLEN QC CLOISTERS

  2. HISTORICAL EXAMPLES OF NEBs ADDING VALUE MARSHALL JÄMO

  3. European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia Vienna conference Commission Proposals NEBs BECOME PART OF THE EQUALITY LANDSCAPE

  4. THE ROLE OF THE CJEU

  5. DIFFERENT KINDS OF CASES Article 267 Staff Cases Other cases

  6. THE ROLE OF THE CJEU IN ARTICLE 267 CASES to ensure that European Union law is applied uniformly by national courts to preserve the unity of the European Union legal order to ensure co-operation between the courts

  7. ACTE CLAIR If acte clair no need for a reference If reference made not relevant that it could be argued to be acte clair Special obligations on final courts of appeal

  8. FOUR EXAMPLES Chacón Navas Coleman Cadman Firma Feryn

  9. CHACÓN NAVAS The concept of disability

  10. COLEMAN Associative discrimination

  11. CADMAN The scheme of the Equal Pay legislation

  12. FIRMA FERYN Enforcement where no victim identified

  13. FOUR KEY POINTS A didactic role teaching the Court A regulatory role setting the norm for the whole of the Union A role where no other person or body able or ready to enforce the law An innovative role taking cases that extend the protection in Union law

  14. NEBs and the CJEU ROBIN ALLEN QC CLOISTERS

More Related