670 likes | 890 Vues
NEW INSTRUMENTS/CASE DISCUSSION. Speaker M Jayasree Moderators J Manju Anju. Contents. Optical Coherence Tomography Microperimetry Multifocal Electroretinogram Glaucoma Diagnostics GDx HRT GLAUCOMA OCT HVF.
E N D
NEW INSTRUMENTS/CASE DISCUSSION Speaker M Jayasree Moderators J Manju Anju
Contents • Optical Coherence Tomography • Microperimetry • Multifocal Electroretinogram • Glaucoma Diagnostics • GDx • HRT • GLAUCOMA OCT • HVF
OCULAR COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE • Optical involves light and optics Used for Optical biopsy of retina. • Coherence– two light beams of same wave length in phase. Uses principle of low coherence interferometry. • Tomography Tome/Tomo – Greek for section /cutting
SDOCT Resolution – 6 microns Wavelength – 840 nm 3-D imaging No movement artifacts 25,000 A-scans/second Determining and visualizing structure that absorb and scatter light Noncontact Noninvasive
Indications • Retinal- macula and Optic nerve. • Inconclusive FFAs- done together. • Quantify extent of lesions ex-CNVM, thickness of macula. • Quantify RNFL thickness around Optic nerve head.
Hypo reflectivity Hyper reflectivity Above the NFL Posterior Hyaloid ,Epiretinal Membrane,Blood In the NFL Inflammation, Cotton Wool Spots, Blood Vessels, Flame Shaped Hemorrhages In the nuclear and plexiform layers Hard Exudates, Dot Blot Hemorrhages In the RPE CC layer Hyperpigmentation, CNV In the sub RPE layer Drusens, Blood, Fibrosis In the choroids Scar, Transmission Absence Edema Cystoid spaces Fluid – serous
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • NORMAL FOVEAL CONTOUR WITH FOVEAL DIP • INNER RETINAL RETINAL LAYERS ARE NORMAL • NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX • FOVEAL THICKNESS
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • THICKENED HYPERREFLECTIVE INNER LAYERS • E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF ACTIVE CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
THICK ERM NOTED • ALTERED FOVEAL CONTOUR • LARGE CNVM, NO E/O SRF SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM
THIN ERM • ELEVATED FOVEAL CONTOUR • THICKENED AND HIGH REFLECTIVE MEMBRANE NOTED SUBFOVEALLY • NO E/O SRF,SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM • SMALL DRUSENOID PED
WRINKLED ILM • ALTERED FOVEAL CONTOUR • INNER RETINAL LAYERS ARE THICK AND CYSTIC SPACES • THICKENED AND HIGH REFLECTIVE RPE-CC COMPLEX WITH MULTIPLE PED
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ELEVATED AND THINNED • HYPER REFLECTIVE INNER LAYES • CSR • SEROUS PED
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • HEMORRHAGIC PED
WRINLED ILM • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS • SEROUS AND FIBROUS PED
INCOMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • FIBROVASCULAR PED
INCOMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • DRUSENOID PED
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • HARD EXUDATES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS • NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • DIFFUSE HARD EXUDATES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS • NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • CSME CME FOVEOLAR DETACHMENT • THICKENED HYPER REFLECTIVE CYSTIC SPACED INNER LAYERS • NORMAL RPE-CC COMPLEX
NORMAL VITREO RETNAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL CONTOUR ELEVATED/THINNING • NEURO SENSORY DETACHMENT • SRF, SUGGESTIVE OF CSR • NORMAL RPE COMPLEX
ERM WITH ILM FOLDS • FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • INNER RETINAL THICKENED • NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
ERM WITH WRINKLING ILM • LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE • THIN INNER RETINAL LAYERS • NORMAL RPE COMPLEX
COMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT • VITREOUS TRACTION RELEASED
NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE • FOVEAL SCHISIS • THINNED CYTIC SPACES INNER LAYERS • RPE ALTERED
FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED • OPTIC DISC PIT
Case 1 PRE TREATMENT • DATE OF VISIT 22/08/08 • BCVA OS 6/36, N36 • SL OS WNL • FUNDUS OS CNVM, SUB RETINAL HEAMORRHAGE • OCT OS E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF ACTIVE CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS OS INJ AVASTIN GIVEN THRICE POST TREATMENT • DATE OF VISIT 22/11/08 • BCVA OS 6/12, N8 • SL OS WNL • FUNDUS OS SCARREDCNVM, • OCT OS NO E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
PROGNOSIS HOLE FORM FACTOR • HFF > 0.9 - 100 % PRIMARY CLOSURE • HFF = 0.5 - 67 % PRIMARY CLOSURE • HFF < 0.5 - Poor closure rates • HIGHER HFF - BETTER POST OP VA
CASE 2 PRE TREATMENT • DATE OF VISIT (25/09/08) • BCVA OS 6/48(ECC VIEW), N24 • S/L OS NO ABNORMALITY • FUNDUS OS FTMH • OCT OS FULL THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE WITH COMPLETE PVD POST TREATMENT S/P VIT+C3F8 UNDER GA • DATE OF VISIT (6/12/08) • BCVA OS 6/12+, N8 • S/L OS WNL • FUNDUS OS • OCT OS
Multifocal electroretinogram • Simultaneous recording of focal retinal responses • Offers direct, objective and topographical mapping of central 36-40º of retinal function • Cone driven responses • Fovea, Para fovea and near peripheral photopic retina function can be evaluated.
mfERG Stimulus • Display contains array of hexagons- • Commonly used 103 hexagonal array • Scaling basis - Photoreceptor density • Produce local retinal responses of equal amplitude • Flickers according to pseudorandom binary m-sequence
1.6° 1.6°- 6° 6°-11.4° 11.4°-18.2° 18.2°-26.2° • 26.2°-35° • Waveforms grouping according to different retinal eccentricities • Subtends 35° horizontally and 31° vertically – viewing distance 53cm • The responses obtained from six zones
First order kernel responses- Interpretation Multiplot Trace Array
mfERG Components Parameters • N1 – First negative trough • P1- First positive Peak • Origins • Cone Photoreceptors • Dominated by on and off bipolar cells P1-IT P1- AMP N1- IT N1-AMP
Interpretation • Degenerative photoreceptor disease • Larger delay in implicit times • Local lesions damaging INL • Larger reduction in amplitudes • Damage to NFL or GCL • No reduction or delay
Clinical applications • To distinguish retinal diseases from optic nerve disease • Details extent of lesion • Sensitive indicator for retinal drug toxicity • Post-operative management following V-R surgery • Assess sub-clinical retinal changes in DR
Case 1 Stargardt’s disease Few yellowish flecks at the macula
Multiplot Crater like defect - MfERG delineates the macular pathology
Case 2 Cone Dystrophy