1 / 11

Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation

Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation. Edith Manosevitch and Dana Walker Kettering Foundation. Opinion Journalism and Democracy.

corine
Télécharger la présentation

Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism:A Space of Public Deliberation Edith Manosevitch and Dana Walker Kettering Foundation

  2. Opinion Journalism and Democracy “Editorial writing is more than another way of making money. It is a profession devoted to the public welfare and to public service. The chief duty of its practitioners is to provide the information and guidance toward sound judgments that are essential to the healthy functioning of a democracy... ....The editorial writer should realize that the public will appreciate more the value of the First Amendment if others are accorded an opportunity for expression. Therefore, voice should be given to diverse opinions, edited faithfully to reflect stated views. Targets of criticism -- whether in a letter, editorial cartoon or signed column -- especially deserve an opportunity to respond....” Basic Statement of Principles of the National Conference of Opinion Writers  (Adopted in Philadelphia, October 10, 1975)

  3. Online JournalismPotential for Civic Participation • Interactivity for citizen participation: Surveys of the field (Nip, 2006; Roseberry, 2005; Schultz, 1999) • User Generated Content: Concerns (Hermida & Thurman, 2007; Thurman, 2006) • Blogs in journalism contexts (Barlow, 2008; Reese et al., 2007). • The content: Does it manifest productive participation? • Reader comments • Opinion journalism

  4. Research Question In what ways and to what extent can reader comments to online journalistic opinion content, embody a space of public deliberation?

  5. Analytic Process Information base: Facts, experience Values Range of solutions Weighing pros, cons, tradeoffs (reasons) Social Process Equal access Mutual comprehension Consideration Respect Defining Public Deliberation (Gastil, 2008)

  6. Method • Pilot study • Data: Readers comments to issue-based editorial/op-ed published Jan. 4-10/08 (n=9), in TCPalm.com & DesMoinesRegister.com. • Content analysis • Unit of analysis: One comment (n=124) • Coding: 9 deliberation criteria: 1 = comment includes criterion 0 = comment does not include criterion

  7. Findings

  8. Table 1: Mean Scores for Deliberation Items by Issue & Newspaper

  9. Discussion • Deliberation: Social-analytic connection Implications: • Discussion threads • The role of design (Wright & Street, 2007) • Personal narratives and deliberation: Implications: • Reader comments -- resource for narratives • Design features to encourage narratives • Online journalism and citizen participation • Normative-economic justification for reader comments (Wahl-Jorgensen, 2002)

  10. Acknowledgments The authors thank the Kettering Foundation for their support of this project, Emily Haas for her diligent coding and insightful observations, and Eddie Roth for fruitful discussions that helped inspire this research.

More Related