1 / 9

Non-compliant behavior in a regulatory biosecurity framework

Non-compliant behavior in a regulatory biosecurity framework. Claire McKee. 22 November 2017. What is our role?. Policy advice, market access negotiation, client service and industry regulation Primary industries Biosecurity Australia’s rivers & freshwater ecosystems.

corybrown
Télécharger la présentation

Non-compliant behavior in a regulatory biosecurity framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-compliant behavior in a regulatory biosecurity framework Claire McKee 22 November 2017

  2. What is our role? . • Policy advice, market access negotiation, client service and industry regulation • Primary industries • Biosecurity • Australia’s rivers & freshwater ecosystems Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 2

  3. Biosecurity at the border in 2016/17: • 20 million inbound travellers • 158 million inbound mail items • 18,000 inbound vessels • 970,000 import cargo assessments • 450,000 commercial consignments • 520,000 non-commercial consignments • 3,653 Approved Arrangements (brokers, depots, importers, treatment providers) . Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 3

  4. Conscious regulatory opponents: summary • Concept: ‘a brain behind the harm’ • Malcolm Sparrow • Elements • Duel regulator vs regulated • Deliberate adaptation Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 4

  5. Conscious regulatory opponents: detail • Assess type/nature of regulatory controls • Opponents who intend to outwit regulator • Develop novel methods to evade regulatory controls Claire McKee 22 November 2017 Department of Agriculture and Water Resources 5

  6. Regulator ≠ conscious regulatory opponents • Wide spectrum • Environmental • Transport, workplace safety • Tax • Law enforcement Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 6

  7. So what? • Implications for probability based assessments • Less predictive • Agility/adaptiveness • Case study: imported prawns/Operation Cattai Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 7

  8. So what: regulatory tools/tactics implications • Understand how regulatory opponents think/act • Tiger/red teams • Novel strategies/counter tactics • Less predictable • New/emerging pattern detection important Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 8

  9. So what: regulatory intelligence • Emergent capability • Different to defence/law enforcement • Common regulatory tools • Behaviour regulation, education, voluntary compliance, best practice • Efficacy of regulatory tools • New tools/tactics Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Claire McKee 22 November 2017 9

More Related