1 / 9

Standing Committee on Performance Management: Update and Status

This report provides an update on the Standing Committee on Performance Management (SCOPM) as of July 26, 2010. Under the chairmanship of Kirk T. Steudle, the committee has focused on creating national performance measures across six key areas: Safety, Preservation, Congestion, System Operations, Freight/Economic Development, and Environment. The task forces have proposed performance indicators and developed a tiered approach for data collection and comparison among states. The report emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders and securing recommendations that can be widely adopted.

coty
Télécharger la présentation

Standing Committee on Performance Management: Update and Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Standing Committee on Performance Management: Update and Status July 26, 2010 Kirk T. Steudle, Director Michigan Department of Transportation

  2. AASHTO SCOPM • History • Pete Rahn first chaired the task forces in February 2008 • I became chair in 2010 of SCOPM and the task forces • Six task forces created to identify National Performance Measures across all states in six key areas • Safety • Preservation • Congestion • System Operations • Freight/Economic Development • Environment

  3. Task Forces • Each lead by a member of the SCOPM • Offered 2-4 performance indicators in each key area • Working with relevant stakeholders to ensure recommendations could be embraced as national performance metrics. • Developed a tiered approach • Tier 1—General consensus on the definition; common method of/or central collection point for data collection ; comparability or can be in the methods/data across the states • Tier 2 : Close to meeting the tier one criteria but still needs some work and consensus amongst DOTs • Tier 3 : Significant work is need to meet the tier 1 criteria

  4. Performance Indicators

  5. Performance Indicators

  6. Performance Indicators

  7. Performance Indicators • Planning and Programming—Led by Deb Miller • Engaging Metropolitan and Regional Planning Organizations • National Summit in September • Comparative Performance Measurement Efforts—Led by Mara Campbell and Daniela Bremmer. • Demonstrate state DOTs can compare performance in areas key to every DOT’s mission. • Focus on three areas: • Project Delivery (On-Time/ On-Budget), • Smooth Pavements, and • Safety. • Livability (raised by FHWA) is a key focus area that needs to be addressed. • No SCOPM Task Force yett

  8. Next Steps Aggressively move towards guides/standards for adoption by appropriate AASHTO committees of the Tier 1 measures Launch serious study efforts at the Tier 2 measures and Tier 3 measures; including comparative measure studies Develop web-based methods for data storage and display at the national level Develop long range research road map Get AMPO and APTA support and transit performance metrics into the package: Planning conference in September will aid in this Get CEO buy in and support at a workshop in the fall a month or so prior to the annual meeting in Biloxi

  9. Thank you!

More Related