1 / 24

Building Research Team Capacity

Building Research Team Capacity. Professor Shelda Debowski Winthrop Professor, Higher Education Development Shelda.Debowski@uwa.edu.au. This presentation. The nature of research groups The importance of good research project management Productivity, performance and innovation

coye
Télécharger la présentation

Building Research Team Capacity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building Research Team Capacity Professor Shelda Debowski Winthrop Professor, Higher Education Development Shelda.Debowski@uwa.edu.au

  2. This presentation • The nature of research groups • The importance of good research project management • Productivity, performance and innovation • Constructive research environments • Research leadership: some fresh insights • Implications for research leadership and management

  3. Unpredictable May be unsuccessful Milestones? Endpoint? Money not contingent on performance Commercialisation possibilities Stakeholder expectations Funding Skill sets Staffing Short-term Specialised Students Recruitment and retention Collaboration Role delineation Communication Intellectual property Timelines Reporting The nature of research groups

  4. The UWA Research Management Checklist • Project phases • Widespread consultation • A quick checklist to act as a cue

  5. The current research context and risks • Global rankings • Track record development and sustenance (focusing on the individual) • Rewards for short-term performance • Grant periods and disrupted career flows • Fellowships context • Resource uncertainty / disruption • Focus on commercialisation / immediate benefits • Loss of organisational memory • Geographic and distance • Political interference • Internal competition (ignoring the collective) • Lack of incentives for collaboration, sharing, risk-taking • Administrative demands and low resource base

  6. Research productivity and innovation • Achieving research productivity and high performance outcomes • Creating the conditions for research success

  7. Productive Research Communities (Bland, Weber-Main, Lund and Finstad, 2005, The Research Productive Department, Wiley)

  8. Is Productivity Enough? Potential Research Outcomes • Research outcomes: • Papers, Grants, PhDs, Fellowships etc • Innovative products, processes and concepts • Collaboration and sharing across time, borders and institutions • Sustainable and growing research enterprise that is well positioned for future growth • Research communities that nurture and value depth and breadth of talent • Time to explore, play, test and apply new and tangential ideas

  9. Defining Innovation The intentional introduction and application within a role, group or organization of ideas, processes, products or procedures, new to the relevant unit of adoption, designed to significantly benefit the individual, the group, organization or wider society. (West M.A. and Farr, J. L. 1990, Innovation at work. In M. A. West and J. L. Farr, (Eds), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Chichester, U. K., Wiley Press: 3 – 13.)

  10. Innovation Enablers • Strategy • Structure and organisation • Innovation culture • Financial Resources • Human Resources • Information and Technology • Idea Generation and Creativity Process Typology of Innovation Enablers. Impactscan: a policy intelligence tools for regional innovation policy. Accessed at: http://extra.iwt.be/impactscan/tool/typology_of_innovation_enablers.htm

  11. Innovation Barriers • Strategy impediments (Kanter, 2006): • Hurdles too high, scope too narrow • Key contributors marginalised • Avoidance of failure / risk taking • Too many avenues being pursued • Process: • Controls too tight • Planning, budgeting, reviews, performance management, focused on meeting short-term KPIs and accountabilities

  12. Innovation Barriers (2) • Structure • Weak connectedness; strong segregation of possible collaborators • Silos limit exchange, dialogue • Limited knowledge of relevant technologies • Skills • Weak / dispersed leadership • Communication across the group is weak • Relevant skills for innovation not nurtured / encouraged.

  13. Creating the context for innovation: our challenge • Innovative hotspots (Gratton, 2007) • Cooperative mindset • Collective intelligence, insights, wisdom, learning, enjoyment, intellectual challenge • Boundary spanning • Depths of relationships, trust, shared expertise, experimentation and merging of knowledge • Igniting purpose • Common and collective mission and purpose • Productive capacity • Best use of talent; effective work context; productive work flows, relationships managed, interdependencies and rhythms co-ordinated,

  14. Productive to innovative • Longer time frames and vision • Negotiate and affirm the research strategy and its directions • Cultivate research leadership throughout the community • Develop an environment that encourages innovation and collaboration • Maximise the use of (and recognise) research talent • Create a learning environment that promotes new skills and capabilities – including your own skill development • Encourage alliances and stakeholder engagement • Encourage innovative practice as well as productive work

  15. Current support for research leaders • The expectations for research success are rapidly escalating, but with little support to increase the required outcomes, • Research leaders are not formally inducted into their roles. • Strategic research leaders in the community, such as the research executive and faculty associate deans (Research), generally emphasise corporate initiatives and priorities and post-graduate research quality assurance. • Research leaders are vulnerable to shifts in their context and funding for their research. • PhD graduates are not well-prepared in the areas of team skills, grant seeking and project management, let alone leadership capabilities. • There is little understanding or infrastructure to support the development of research leadership capabilities.

  16. Indicators of research success (Debowski 2010) Traditional metrics Collaboration / Stakeholder Engagement Impact Leadership Effectiveness

  17. Societal impact Adjunct appointments International recognition Editorial boards Teaching /research nexus Research translation Influence on policies Education of politicians Public outreach Impact

  18. Collaboration / Stakeholder Engagement • Collaborations • Industry partnerships • Philanthropy • External partnerships • Consultancies, focus on diversifying funding options • Effective communications with stakeholders and potential partners • Sustainable advisory committees

  19. Leadership Effectiveness • Clearly defined mission • Effective strategy • Integrity and ethical practices • Positive perceptions of the research group and its contribution • Reputation • Quality of papers, graduates, labs, pedigree • University valuing / recognition

  20. The challenges of leading research • Maintain an outstanding track record across the traditional measures of excellent performance • Develop a strategic vision for the research group • Consolidate the research niche • Move the research group forward • Flexible, effective decision making and good delegation • Lead and manage the research team • Deal with underperformance, difficult personalities, depression and team conflict • Team development • Balance the many demands • Manage overall productivity and impact • Innovate and collaborate

  21. Research Leadership Capabilities • University and research strategy, policy and protocols • Research project and risk management, quality assurance, including national performance indicators and their meaning • Research capacity building, research training and research management, risk management, quality assurance, national performance indicators and their meaning • Financial management • Human resource management, recruitment, selection, performance management, conflict resolution, mentorship and capacity building • Marketing and sponsorship of the group and its outcomes • In some cases, facility and laboratory management • Collaborative and productive research network management, particularly with those working in other disciplines, and • Relationship management, industry engagement and philanthropy……

  22. Creating a responsive support environment 1 • Research leader inductions – provided at faculty and university levels to encourage improved awareness of policy and performance expectations; • The provision of a research leadership programme that explores the role and its successful enactment. • Access to 360 degree reviews, models, mentorship, coaching, and shadowing; • The brokering of a research leadership network that allows ongoing discussion of complex leadership matters; • Facilitation of team building and strategic reviews; • Mentorship capacity building;

  23. Creating a responsive support environment 2 • Early career researcher development programmes • Inclusion in university retreats and faculty planning days; • Increased access to university executive to debate university policy and funding strategies; • The provision of targeted, relevant and research-specific workshops that address emergent leadership and management issues; • Access to professional support teams at point of need, and • Professional guides and tools that offer just-in-time advice when a crisis might occur.

  24. The broader research context • How can we better articulate, value and acknowledge research leadership and management? • We need to review the metrics by which we measure research success • We should place greater emphasis on recognising and facilitating innovation and creative research leadership and management • Our promotion systems and university support strategies need significant reform to ensure high quality research leadership.

More Related