60 likes | 189 Vues
This document discusses the analysis of energy spectra with and without temperature correction for ScECAL, presented during a group meeting at Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea, on April 28th, 2010. The study, led by Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi, and DongHee Kim, examines the mean energy deposit and energy resolution using a quadratic fitting method. Results indicate no significant difference post temperature corrections, showing the robustness of the energy measurement in varying temperature conditions.
E N D
ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group MeetingKyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea,April 28th , 2010 Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim
Energy Spectrum with out Temperature Correction # of counts Energy Deposit in ScECAL (MIPS) Mean Energy(GeV) Sig/E 1/sqrt(E)
Energy Spectrum with Temperature Correction # of counts Esum += (slope*Nominal Temp+offset) / (Slope*HM3Temp+offset)*En TNominal = 25C After using Temperature Correction Factor, the result is almost same, No significant difference. The quadratic function“Pol2” is used for fitting Energy Resolution. Energy Deposit in ScECAL (MIPS) Mean Energy(GeV) Sig/E 1/sqrt(E)
BACK UP Esum += (slope*Nominal Temp+offset) / (Slope*HM3Temp+offset)*En TNominal = 25C
ScECAL Temp Vs HcalM3temp 1 ScECALTemp(C) hCALM3Temp(C) Splitted into 4 parts , in order to make the Temp distribution for linear Fit 2 3 4
Mip Constant Vs Correlated Temp Temperature=P0* hCALM3 + P1 MipConst and Temperature Obtained Run by Run