1 / 22

Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Second Public Hearing

Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Second Public Hearing. Jennifer Bowen University of Rochester jbowen@library.rochester.edu Chicago, IL May 9, 2007. My perspectives. International descriptive cataloging standards development (RDA)

creola
Télécharger la présentation

Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Second Public Hearing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic ControlSecond Public Hearing Jennifer Bowen University of Rochester jbowen@library.rochester.edu Chicago, IL May 9, 2007

  2. My perspectives • International descriptive cataloging standards development (RDA) • Defining/developing a next generation “catalog” • Cataloging manager at a smaller ARL institution

  3. My topics • Current structures and standards vis-à-vis RDA development • Future of controlled data • New requirements for bibliographic data • What’s needed for future standards development

  4. Current structures and standards vis-à-vis RDA

  5. RDA development structure RDA Project Manager RDA Editor JSC Secretary

  6. What can RDA accomplish? • More flexible, up-to-date standard to replace AACR2 • Create a useful tool for catalogers • Easier to train new catalogers • Facilitate cataloging digital resources in a library environment • Promote international adoption of a common standard

  7. What has hampered RDA development? • Too much hype! • Need for backwards compatibility • Tight funding and timeline • Success of standard tied to success of the commercial product • Consultation process needed improvement

  8. Consulting other communities • Which communities to consul? • What do we gain? • Ensuring successful consultations

  9. Which communities to consult? • Those with similar missions to our own • Archives, museums • Others whose metadata we want to share • Publishing, metadata communities • Communities that can assist us

  10. What do we gain? • Metadata interoperability • Envision technology trends and opportunities • Improve standards development process • Help us undertake user research

  11. Ensuring successful consultations • Must be at the appropriate level • Often will need to be on-going, not one-time events • Need organizational structures and funding to maintain relationships • Allow for serendipity (this needs funding too!)

  12. Recommendations for RDA • Move forward with first release in 2009 • Aggressively pursue development of RDA application profile, related efforts • Restructure JSC work to focus on consultation, not document editing

  13. Future of controlled data

  14. Controlled data: what’s needed • Need identifiers! • Evaluate potential based on well-designed systems • Provide better tools for catalogers • Facilitate faceted browsing

  15. New requirements for bibliographic data

  16. Creating richer interfaces • Web services to enrichment data • Metadata to support faceted browsing • FRBR-informed navigation • Relator information • Controlled access points

  17. Testing environments • Encourage experimentation and research • Opportunities to develop new system functionalities • User research and usability testing • Support open-source community • Feed “lessons learned” into standards development

  18. Sharing metadata • Between repositories, similar discovery environments • Share local augmentation, results of experimentation • Distinguish standard from local metadata, but share both • Within other discovery environments • Components to “connect” systems

  19. What’s needed for future standards development?

  20. What is our vision? • Users have a positive experience locating library resources • Users are led to library resources from wherever they happen to be online • Library “solutions” are seen as useful in the broader world

  21. A positive vision for bibliographic control Catalogers/metadata professionals… • Have effective tools, can focus on intellectual work • Participate in designing how systems use metadata • Contribute widely to improving shared metadata • Are confident that systems will use their work effectively

  22. What’s needed right now? • Positive, decisive future action • Clearly redefine roles and responsibilities • Explain, justify trade-offs • Articulate a positive vision for the future of bibliographic control

More Related