1 / 43

School District 10 (Arrow Lakes) District Reading Assessment Results Grades K-9 3-Year Comparison

School District 10 (Arrow Lakes) District Reading Assessment Results Grades K-9 3-Year Comparison. Questions to Consider/ Patterns to Ponder/ Nuances to Notice: To what extend do the results align with what you expected to see? How do the results compare with other information that exists?

cstaley
Télécharger la présentation

School District 10 (Arrow Lakes) District Reading Assessment Results Grades K-9 3-Year Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. School District 10 (Arrow Lakes)District Reading Assessment Results Grades K-93-Year Comparison • Questions to Consider/ Patterns to Ponder/ Nuances to Notice: • To what extend do the results align with what you expected to see? • How do the results compare with other information that exists? • What are areas of strength? • What are areas of stretch that may need further attention? • Where do you see growth over time? • What patterns do you see over the 3 snapshots at progress at each grade? • What efforts are planned or underway to support student success?

  2. District Assessment Reading Results – Kindergarten Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 19/19 Kindergarten Students Assessment Task: Early Primary Reading Assessment (EPRA) Spring assessment in May of K-2 students ability to understand text they read

  3. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 1 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 23/24 Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 92%, 22/24 Students

  4. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 2 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 26/27Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 93%, 26/28 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate 92%, 22/24 Students

  5. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 3 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 90%, 27/30 Students Assessment Task: District Assessment Reading Team (DART) Spring assessment in May of gr. 3-8 students’ ability to read and understand nonfiction text based on BC Performance Standards in Reading 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 88%, 29/33 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 26/27 Students

  6. District Assessment Reading Results K-3 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to K-3 Early Literacy Screen Results Some students who are MM or FM still have phonological awareness and fluency needs Connections to FSA Gr. 4 FSA Gr. 4 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Balanced Literacy instruction, Daily 5, Use of Early Literacy Screen to determine entry points for Response to Intervention • Student Strengths: • Range of achievement in K • See movement from NM, MM to FM or Exceeding • By Gr 3: Reduced the number of NM (4%), Number of FM & Exc (52%) • Student Stretches: • For Gr 1-3: Many student results are still MM (44%) • Gr 3 MM outcome shows struggle w/ nonfiction text of the DART

  7. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 4 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 22/23 Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 88%, 21/24 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 21/23 Students

  8. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 5 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 43/45 Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 89%, 41/46 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 36/36 Students

  9. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 6 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 32/35 students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 97%, 34/35 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 90%, 27/30 Students

  10. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 7 Students 2017- 2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 29/29 students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 26/26 students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 28/28 students

  11. District Assessment Reading Results 4-7 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to FSA Gr. 7 FSA Gr. 7 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Balanced Literacy instruction, Daily 5, provide entry points for Response to Intervention Literacy Goal in 2018-19 School Growth Plans • Student Strengths: • Across the 3 year comparison, see a decrease in NM and some movement from MM to FM or Exc • By Gr 6: Reduced the number of NM (0%), Number of FM & Exc is (85%) • Student Stretches: • Many Gr. 5 student results are still MM (44%) & by Gr. 7 MM (28%) with more focused work needed

  12. District Assessment Reading Results –Grade 8 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate - 97%, 34/35 Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate - 98 %, 40/41 Students 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 32/32 Students

  13. District Assessment Reading Results – Grade 9 Students 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate - 94%, 31/33 Students 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate - %, 5/6 Students *MISSING NSS 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 32/32 Students

  14. District Assessment Reading Results 8-9 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to Report Card Data: TBD Underway & Planned: Content-area reading with Balanced Literacy Instruction, Lit and Non-Fiction focus the work of all teachers to provide for Response to Intervention, LRT support in class. Literacy Goal in 2018-19 School Growth Plans • Student Strengths: • Across the 3 year comparison, see a decrease in NM and some movement from MM to FM or Exc • By Gr 9: Reduced the number of NM (0%), Number of FM & Exc is (77%) • Student Stretches: • Some Gr. 8 student results are still MM (21%) and by Gr. 9 MM (26%) with more focused work needed

  15. District Assessment Reading Results – K-9 Summary 2017-2018 Reading Achievement Results 2016-2017 Reading Achievement Results *MISSING NSS data for Grades 8, 9 2015-2016 Reading Achievement Results

  16. School District 10 (Arrow Lakes)District Writing Assessment Results Grades 2-103-Year Comparison Assessment Task: Students demonstrate their skills in writing in response to an impromptu writing topic to show what they know about writing in May. Topics this year included: • My favorite kind of weather is… • Five rules for outer space should be… • What if _____had feelings? • If you could be any animal you like (real or make believe) what would you choose and why? • If I woke up one morning to find myself invisible, I would… • If you could push a rewind, pause, or fast forward button for your life, which would you select and why? • Imagine that it is 30 years in the future. What does your digital footprint reveal about you?

  17. District Assessment Writing Results –Grade 2 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 26/27 Students

  18. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 3 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 93%, 27/29 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 88%, 29/33 Students

  19. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 4 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 21/23 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 83%, 20/24 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 100%, 36/36 Students

  20. District Assessment Writing Results 2-4 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to FSA Gr. 4 FSA Gr. 4 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Balanced Literacy instruction, Daily 5 to determine entry points for Response to Intervention Literacy Goal specific to writing in 2018-19 School Growth Plans • Student Strengths: • Range of achievement • See movement from NM, MM to FM or Exceeding • By Gr 3: Reduced the number of NM (4%), Number of FM & Exc (63%) • Student Stretches: • For Gr 2: Many student results are still MM (19%) • For Gr 3: MM (33%) outcome show exploration beyond story to descriptive & essay response • Gr 4 results reflect a vulnerable cohort of learners

  21. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 5 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 38/38 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 89%, 41/46 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 100% 36/36 Students

  22. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 6 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 97%, 32/33 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 83%, 29/35 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 94%, 29/31 Students

  23. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 7 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 28/28 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 83%, 29/35 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 96%, 27/28 Students

  24. District Assessment Writing Results 5-7 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to FSA Gr. 7 FSA Gr. 7 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Balanced Literacy instruction, Daily 5, Lit. Circles w/ writing in different genres provide entry points for Response to Intervention Literacy Goal specific to writing in 2018-19 School Growth Plans • Student Strengths: • Across the 3 year comparison, see a lot of variability in results: some decreases in NM and some movement from MM to FM or Exc • By Gr 6: Reduced the number of NM (3%), Number of FM & Exc is (62%) • Student Stretches: • Many Gr 7 student results are still NM (11%) or MM (46%) with more focused work in writing needed

  25. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 8 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 27/28 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 98%, 40/41 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 100%, 39/39 Students

  26. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 9 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 27/28 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 83%, 29/35 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 97%, 32/33 Students

  27. District Assessment Writing Results – Grade 10 Students 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 25/25 Students 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate – 85%, 35/41 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 89%, 32/36 Students

  28. District Assessment Writing Results 8-10 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to Report Card Data: TBD Underway & Planned: Content-area reading with Balanced Literacy Instruction, Lit and Non-Fiction focus the work of all teachers to provide for Response to Intervention, LRT support in class. Literacy Goal in 2018-19 School Growth Plans • Student Strengths: • Across the 3 year comparison, see a decrease in NM and some movement from MM to FM or Exc • By Gr 10: Reduced the number of NM (0%), Number of FM & Exc is (52%) • Student Stretches: • Some Gr 8 student results are still MM (44%) reflecting an Elem. to Sec. transition • By Gr 10: MM (48%) with more focused work & attention needed

  29. District Assessment Writing Results – Grades 2-10 Summary 2017-2018 Writing Achievement Results 2016-2017 Writing Achievement Results 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results

  30. School District 10 (Arrow Lakes)District Numeracy Assessment Results Grades 1-93-Year Comparison District Numeracy Spring Assessment: Students in grades 1-9 demonstrate their thinking about mathematical concepts in an embedded, contextualized, authentic, open-ended numeracy task from the Diagnostic Math Assessment in May – Northern Lights Assessment (Fullerton, 2014) • Questions to Consider/ Patterns to Ponder/ Nuances to Notice: • To what extend do the results align with what you expected to see? • How do the results compare with other information that exists? • What are areas of strength? • What are areas of stretch that may need further attention? • Where do you see growth over time? • What patterns do you see over the 3 snapshots at progress at each grade? • What efforts are planned or underway to support student success?

  31. District Assessment Numeracy Results –Grade 1 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 71%, 17/24 Students

  32. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 2 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 26/27 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 79%, 23/29 Students

  33. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 3 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 90%, 27/30 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 30/33 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 96%, 26/27 Students

  34. District Assessment Numeracy Results 1-3 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to FSA Gr. 4 FSA Gr. 4 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Focused number sense and operations instruction w/ adaptation of Daily 5 to Numeracy instruction to support struggling learners & determine entry points for Response to Intervention • Student Strengths: • Gr 1 achievement is very promising • See movement from NM, MM to FM or Exceeding • Gr 2 Reduced the number of NM (0%), Number of FM & Exc (45%) • Student Stretches: • For Gr 1 & 2: Many student results are still MM (29% & 23%) • Gr 3 NM (22%); MM (37 reflects a vulnerable cohort

  35. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 4 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 21/23 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 88%, 21/24 Students 2015-2016 Writing Achievement Results Participation Rate 87%, 20/23 Students

  36. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 5 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 93%, 40/43 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 91%, 42/43 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 97%, 35/36 Students

  37. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 6 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 89%, 31/35 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 97%, 34/35 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 94%, 29/31 Students

  38. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 7 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 93%, 27/29 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 96%, 25/26 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 96%, 27/28 Students

  39. District Assessment Numeracy Results 4-7 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to FSA Gr. 7 FSA Gr 7 Fall 2017 Results not yet available Underway & Planned: Focused number sense and operations instruction w/ adaptation of Daily 5 to Numeracy instruction and Math Wonder Walks as staff continue to implement professional learning gained with Carole Fullerton • Student Strengths: • See movement from NM, MM to FM or Exceeding • Gr 6 Reduced the number of NM (3%), Number of FM & Exc (62%) • Student Stretches: • For Gr 4, 6 & 7: Many student results are still MM (81%, 35% & 33%) • A range of achievement variability in Gr 5 NM (23%); MM (28%) reflects a vulnerable cohort

  40. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 8 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 94%, 33/35 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 100%, 41/41 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 100%, 40/40 Students

  41. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grade 9 Students 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 85%, 28/33 Students 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate – 97%, 31/32 Students 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results Participation Rate 100%, 32/32 Students

  42. District Assessment Numeracy Results 8-9 Strengths & Stretches Connections & Support Efforts Connections to Report Card Data: TBD Underway & Planned: Number sense and operations focus as staff continue to implement professional learning gained from sessions with Carole Fullerton. Focus on provision of Response to Intervention, LRT support in class. Numeracy Goal in 2018-19 NSS School Growth Plan Note: No Gr. 9 Numeracy data from Lucerne Secondary • Student Strengths: • Across the 3 year comparison, see a decrease in NM and some movement from MM to FM or Exc • Both Gr 8 & Gr 9 cohorts have made some gains over 3 years • By Gr 9: Reduced the number of NM (14%), Number of FM & Exc is (64%) • Student Stretches: • By Gr 9: student results still reflect NM (14%), MM (21%) with more focused work & attention needed

  43. District Assessment Numeracy Results – Grades 1-9 Summary 2017-2018 Numeracy Achievement Results 2016-2017 Numeracy Achievement Results 2015-2016 Numeracy Achievement Results

More Related