1 / 18

GQM v6

Agnieszka Priebe. GQM v6. CERN BE-BI-BL. Student Meeting. 26 th December 2012. Geanto - Quencho -Meter. ROOT program for Quench Test analysis Geant4 simulations compared to experimental data Experimental data: directly loaded from LD base

cullen
Télécharger la présentation

GQM v6

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AgnieszkaPriebe GQMv6 CERN BE-BI-BL Student Meeting 26thDecember 2012

  2. Geanto-Quencho-Meter • ROOT program for Quench Test analysis • Geant4 simulations compared to experimental data • Experimental data: directly loaded from LD base • Geant4 data: 71 point-like losses weighted by coefficients • Tasks: • Validating the assumed loss pattern • Edep distribution in the SC coils, secondary particles distribution in BLMs, BLM signals • Options: • Symmetrical Gaussian loss shape (free parameters: μ, σ) • Asymmetrical Gaussian loss shape (free parameters: μ, σright, σleft) • Loss shape loaded from a file • Loss shape from Aperture Meter (to be implemented again) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  3. Geanto-Quencho-Meter • ROOT program for Quench Test analysis • Geant4 simulations compared to experimental data • Experimental data: directly loaded from LD base • Geant4 data: 71 point-like losses weighted by coefficients • Tasks: • Validating the assumed loss pattern • Edep distribution in the SC coils, secondary particles distribution in BLMs, BLM signals • Options: • Symmetrical Gaussian loss shape (free parameters: μ, σ) • Asymmetrical Gaussian loss shape (free parameters: μ, σright, σleft) • Loss shape loaded from a file • Loss shape from Aperture Meter (to be implemented again) Program re-written, no problems with files any more Memory problems for 1.6·106 iterations ? AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  4. GQM: correlation coefficients • Error factor • Looking for: minimum • Linear coefficient factor • Looking for: maximum (value the closer to 1) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  5. GQM: loss pattern optimization • Loss pattern- symmetric Gaussian: μ = 0 m, σright= 1.77 m, σleft= 1.77 m • Maximum of secondary particles in the interconnection region • Maximum of Edep close to the end of MQ AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  6. GQM: loss pattern optimization • Loss pattern- asymmetric Gaussian: μ = 0 m, σright= 1.77 m, σleft= 1.10 m • Maximum of secondary particles in the interconnection region • Maximum of Edep close to the endgof MQ AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  7. GQM: loss pattern from fluka • Loss pattern from Anton Lechner – with magnetic field • Maximum of secondary particles in the centre ofMQ • Maximum of Edep close to the beginning of MQ Geant4 simulations: Energy: 3.5 TeV Angle 202 μrad Fluka simulations: Energy: 4 TeV Angle 200 μrad AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  8. GQM: loss pattern from fluka • Loss pattern from Anton Lechner – without magnetic field • Maximum of secondary particles in the centre ofMQ • Maximum of Edep close to the beginning of MQ Geant4 simulations: Energy: 3.5 TeV Angle 202 μrad Fluka simulations: Energy: 4 TeV Angle 200 μrad AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  9. GQM: optimized loss pattern • Loss pattern optimized in three dimensional space (asymmetrical) • Maximum of secondary particles in the interconnection region • Maximum of Edep close to the end of MQ Δσ = 10% (from 0.5 to 4) Δμ = 0.1 mfrom (-1 to 1, after initial optimization with larger steps) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  10. GQM: optimized loss pattern For μ = 0.4 m(min of Σ) • Loss pattern optimized in three dimensional space (asymmetrical) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  11. GQM: optimized loss pattern • Loss pattern optimized in three dimensional space (asymmetrical) More sensitive AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  12. GQM: optimized loss pattern • Loss pattern optimized in two dimensional space (symmetrical) • Maximum of secondary particles in the interconnection region • Maximum of Edep close to the end of MQ Δσ = 10% (from 0.5 to 4) Δμ = 0.1 mfrom (-1 to 1, after initial optimization with larger steps) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  13. GQM: optimized loss pattern • Loss pattern optimized in two dimensional space (symmetrical) For μ = 0.5 m(min of Σ) AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  14. GQM summary • A tool for estimations the loss patterns • Two criteria of determination the agreement between Geant4simulations and experimental data • Minimum Σ is used are the most important factor • Since Geant4 simulations are time-independedent , they can be used for various loss duration scenarios • Integrated loss over 6s is considered, no time evolution involved AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  15. Thank you for you attention ! Questions? Comments? Remarks? AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  16. GQM: loss pattern optimization • Loss pattern- symmetric Gaussian: μ = 0 m, σright= 1.6 m, σleft= 1.6 m • Maximum of secondary particles in the centre ofMQ • Maximum of Edep close to the beginning of MQ Geant4 simulations: Energy: 3.5 TeV Angle 202 μrad Fluka simulations: Energy: 4 TeV Angle 200 μrad AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  17. GQM: loss pattern from fluka • Loss pattern from Anton Lechner – with magnetic field • Maximum of secondary particles in the centre ofMQ • Maximum of Edep close to the beginning of MQ Geant4 simulations: Energy: 3.5 TeV Angle 202 μrad Fluka simulations: Energy: 4 TeV Angle 200 μrad AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

  18. GQM: loss pattern from fluka • Loss pattern from Anton Lechner – without magnetic field • Maximum of secondary particles in the interconnection region • Maximum of Edep close to the end of MQ Geant4 simulations: Energy: 3.5 TeV Angle 202 μrad Fluka simulations: Energy: 4 TeV Angle 200 μrad AgnieszkaPriebe 26thDecember 2012 Student Meeting

More Related