1 / 24

Safety Study Presentation

Safety Study Presentation. South Avenue Intersection Safety and Operations Study Presentation Mahoning County. Safety Study Presentation. Project Location & Description The South Avenue Corridor Mathews Road to Midlothian Boulevard Distance – 1.7 Miles

curran-anderson
Télécharger la présentation

Safety Study Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Safety Study Presentation South Avenue Intersection Safety and Operations Study Presentation Mahoning County

  2. Safety Study Presentation • Project Location & Description • The South Avenue Corridor • Mathews Road to Midlothian Boulevard • Distance – 1.7 Miles • Approximate ADT – 10,320 Opening Year & Design Year • Certified Traffic Obtained & Used for Analysis

  3. Safety Study Presentation South Avenue Study Area

  4. Safety Study Presentation • Historic Safety Listings • #1 – Intersection – South Avenue / Mathews Road – Mahoning County Maintained Intersections • #10 – Intersection – South Avenue / Mathews Road – Eastgate 2012 Study • #11 – Intersection – South Avenue / Midlothian Blvd. – Eastgate 2012 Study • #32 – Intersection – South Avenue / Indianola Road – Eastgate 2012 Study • #128 – Intersection – South Avenue / Afton Avenue – Eastgate 2012 Study • #12 – Segment – Afton to Indianola – Eastgate 2012 Study

  5. Safety Study Presentation • Crash Analysis Summary • 211 Crashes reported on segment from 2009-2011 • 128 Rear End • 26 Angle • 25 Left Turn • 16 Fixed Object • 15 Sideswipe • 1 Pedestrian • *Note the High number of Rear End Collisions • Conclusion – Crashes within the area are related to operational issues and congestion associated with project area.

  6. Safety Study Presentation Intersection 1 & Segment 1 - Mathews Road to Indianola

  7. Safety Study Presentation Segment 1 – Mathews to Indianola

  8. Safety Study Presentation Intersection 2 & Segment 2 – Indianola Road to Lake Park Road

  9. Safety Study Presentation Intersection 3 & Segment 3 – Lake Park Road to Midlothian

  10. Safety Study Presentation Segment 3 – Lake Park Road to Midlothian

  11. Safety Study Presentation Segment 3 – Lake Park Road to Midlothian

  12. Safety Study Presentation Segment 3 – Lake Park Road to Midlothian

  13. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Countermeasures • Intersection Improvements • Signal Timing Improvements – Mathews • Mathews Road Westbound – Extend Left Turn Lane • Intersection Capacity Improvements – Indianola Road • Roundabout Treatment – Lake Park Boulevard • Segment Improvements • Additional NB and SB Thru Lane – Mathews to Indianola • TWLTL – Mathews to Indianola • TWLTL – Lake Park to Midlothian • Repave Roadway due to Widening and Resurfacing • Access Management Recommendations • Revise Access to St. Luke’s Church at Indianola

  14. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Mathews Road Intersection Area

  15. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Segment 2 – Mathews to Indianola

  16. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Segments 1 and 2 and Indianola Intersection

  17. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Lake Park Intersection and Segment 3 (Lake Park to Midlothian)

  18. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Segment 3 (Lake Park to Midlothian)

  19. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Segment 3 (Lake Park to Midlothian)

  20. Safety Study Presentation Proposed Improvement Countermeasures Segment 3 (Lake Park to Midlothian)

  21. Safety Study Presentation Project Cost Estimate and Rate of Return Total Cost Estimate of all improvements, Design, Right-of-Way, Construction , Construction Inspection: $13,932,500 Rate of Return on Project: 0.85% Total Safety Funding Request: $5,000,000 Rate of Return on HSP Funding: 13.08%

  22. Safety Study Presentation Current Project Financial Plan Current Project Funding Plan Funding Type Dollar Amount % of Total Safety Funding Request: $5,000,000 35.9% CEAO HSIP Funding Request: $5,000,000 35.9% EASTGATE Funding Request: $2,188,506 15.7% Local Funding: $1,742,994 12.5% Total Project Funding: $13,932,500 Depending upon funding received from Safety and CEAO HSIP, the project may need to be broken into phases for construction.

  23. Safety Study Presentation Select District DSRT Questions / Comments Comment 1: Consider extending widening for NB thru lane to drop right at the Lake Park intersection instead of at Indianola into Church. Comment 2: Consider including alternative analysis for Lake Park Intersection for Roundabout vs. Intersection improvement Comment 3: Consider Splitting into Multiple Projects for Funding Flexibility. Comment 4: Consider review of TWLTL North of Lake Park. Comment 5: Coordinate Midlothian improvements with current South Avenue / City of Youngstown Signal project.

  24. Corridor and Safety Study Questions Michael A. Hobbs, P.E., PTOE GPD Lead Traffic Engineer Ryan M. Gillespie, P.E., PTOE GPD Traffic Engineer Mark R. Grossman, P.E. GPD Chief Highway Engineer

More Related