1 / 10

An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions

An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions. Marchall H. Medoff Economic Inquiry ; Apr 1988; 26, 2; pg353-359. I. Introduction. Main Research Question: Empirical estimation of the demand for abortions Literature Review: the economic model of fertility control

curry
Télécharger la présentation

An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions Marchall H. Medoff Economic Inquiry; Apr 1988; 26, 2; pg353-359

  2. I. Introduction • Main Research Question: • Empirical estimation of the demand for abortions • Literature Review: the economic model of fertility control • Michael, Robert “Education and the Derived Demand for Children.” Journal of Political Economy, 1973

  3. II. Theoretical Model • The economic model of fertility control: a household choice model • A household’s fertility control decision is based on a comparison of the costs and benefits associated with an additional child over time. • If the net cost if positive, a woman will engage in fertility control by purchasing and using goods and time inputs to reduce the probability of conception. • One good (zero probability of conception) is abortion.

  4. II. Theoretical Model (Regression Equation) • Corrections to the equations in the paper • Population regression equation: in equation (1) Ai=b0+b1Pi+b2Yi+b3SNGLi+b4LEPi+b5CATHi+b6Wi+b7Mi+ui • Estimated regression equation: in equation (2) Âi=-207.78-0.942Pi+0.031Yi+4.194SNGLi+4.456LEPi +1.207CATHi+18.287Wi+43.775Mi

  5. II. Theoretical Model (Regression Equation) • Ai=b0+b1Pi+b2Yi+b3SNGLi+b4LEPi+b5CATHi+b6Wi+b7Mi+ui • Abortion rate (the number of abortions per thousand pregnancies) of women of childbearing age 15 to 44 in state i during the 1980 calendar year (A) • State average price of abortion (P): b1<0 • State average Income (Y): b2> or <0 • Percentage of unmarried women (SNGL):b3>0 • Labor force participation rate(LEP):b4>0 • Percentage of Catholic population (CATH):b5<0 • States in the far West(CA, OR, WA, NV, AZ, HW) (W):b6>0 • Medicaid funding abortions (M): b7>0

  6. Summary Statistics

  7. Abortion ratios and rates • Abortion rate: number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years • Abortion ratio: number of abortions per 1,000 live births • Figure 1 and Tables: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5713a1.htm?s_cid=ss5713a1_e • Figure at the bottom: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sfaa/texas.html

  8. III. Empirical Results • 2SLS (IVs) results • Ai=-207.78-0.942Pi+0.031Yi+4.194SNGLi+4.456LEPi (1.42) (3.22) (3.31) (1.74) (2.57) +1.207CATHi+18.287Wi+43.775Mi, (1.50) (1.74) (2.12) R2=0.77, n=50 • Price elasticity of demand:

  9. III. Empirical Results (cont.) • Compare the results to the hypothesis • Comply with the law of demand • Consistent except CATH • Possible missing variables: • Education • may reduce the abortion by increasing the knowledge of effective contraceptive methods • may increase the abortion by increasing the opportunity costs of time • Aid to Families with Dependent Children(AFDC) • Corr(Y,Poverty)<0, Corr(A,Y)>0, Corr(A,Poverty)<0 • The effect of income is overestimated

  10. IV. Policy Implications • Forbidding all Medicaid-financed abortion: • Reduction of 44 abortions per thousand pregnancies or a 17.5% drop (262,500/1.5 million) in the 1980 abortion rate. • Illegalizing all abortions (assuming the illegal price is 50% higher) : • 50 % Increases in P would decrease abortion rate by 40.5 % (607,500/1.5 million). • The annual increase in the abortion rate is likely to be persistent due to high income, high divorce rates, low marriage rate

More Related