1 / 30

Chapter 18 Management Of Employee Conduct: Agency

Chapter 18 Management Of Employee Conduct: Agency. Names and Roles: Agency Terminology. Nature of Agency Agency relationship is one in which one party agrees to act on behalf of another. Examples: sales clerks, real estate agents, sports agents Agent Party who acts for another

cutler
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 18 Management Of Employee Conduct: Agency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 18Management Of Employee Conduct: Agency

  2. Names and Roles: Agency Terminology • Nature of Agency • Agency relationship is one in which one party agrees to act on behalf of another. • Examples: sales clerks, real estate agents, sports agents • Agent • Party who acts for another • Principal • The party for whom the agent acts

  3. Names and Roles: Agency Terminology • Master/Servant • Relationship in which the master/principal exercises a great deal of control over the servant/ agent. Most common form is employer/employee relationship • Factors that control whether this type of relationship exists • Level of supervision • Level of control • Regularity of hours and pay • Length of employment

  4. Names and Roles: Agency Terminology • Independent contractor • Hired to perform a task but is not directly supervised • Example: Lawyer • Agency Law • Restatement of Agency • Common law followed by most courts

  5. Names and Roles: Agency Terminology • Three Parts to Agency Law • Creating the agency relationship • Relationship between principal and agent • Relationships of agent and principal to third parties

  6. Creation of the Agency Relationship • Creating the Agency Relationship • Created when the principal hires someone • Express Authority Agency • Created by principal stating or writing that agency exists and the authority thereof • Requires oral or written agreement - must be in writing if required by statute of frauds • Example: Agency contract is longer than one year

  7. Creation of the Agency Relationship • The Writing • If the agent’s contracts must be in writing, the authority must be in writing • Requirement of Capacity • Principal must have capacity • Age and mental capacity

  8. Creation of the Agency Relationship • Requirement of Capacity • Unincorporated associations do not have capacity • Have no legal existence • Members will be liable since there is no principal • When the capacity of agent becomes an issue • Not an issue when it concerns authority to enter contracts • Is an issue when it concerns potential liability to third parties

  9. Creation of the Agency Relationship • Implied Authority • The extension of express authority by custom • Apparent Authority • Arises from the way agents present themselves to third parties • Also called agency by estoppel or ostensible authority • Examples: Failure to notify of an agent’s retirement, allowing bank to use your name for another’s loan

  10. Creation of the Agency Relationship • Case 18.1 Streetman v. Benchmark Bank (1995) • What did the Streetmans say that Watts promised them? • Would Watts have the authority to make that promise?

  11. Creation of the Agency Relationship • Agency by Ratification • Principal reviews contract and decides to honor it even though agent had no authority to enter into it. • Fiduciary Relationship • Agent acts in the principal’s best interests • Loyalty, trust, care, obedience • Loyalty • Agent can’t represent both sides • Can’t make a profit at principal’s expense

  12. The Principal-Agent Relationship • Case 18.2 Silva v. Bisbee(1981) • What did agent Bisbee fail to disclose? • Was agent Bisbee representing both sides in a transaction? • Why is Midkiff also liable?

  13. The Principal-Agent Relationship • Case 18.3 Coady v. Harpo, Inc. (1999) • What did Ms. Coady agree to at the time of employment? • Is there a difference between a confidentiality agreement and covenant not to compete? • Was the Oprah covenant enforceable?

  14. The Principal-Agent Relationship • Obedience • Follows principal’s instructions • Need not do anything illegal • Duty of care • Give time and effort • Follow through • Principal’s Duties and Rights • Duty to pay -- Except gratuitous agency • Duty to reimburse

  15. Liability of Principals for Agents’ Conduct • The Relationship With Third Parties • Contract liability and issues of disclosure • Principal has full liability for authorized acts of agent and those done with apparent authority • Disclosed principal—principal is fully liable; agent is not unless the agent had no authority • Partially disclosed principal—agent indicates there is a principal but does not tell who it is; third party can hold either liable • Undisclosed principal—agent does not disclose there is a principal; agent stands alone unless principal comes forward

  16. Liability of Principals for Agents’ Conduct • The Relationship With Third Parties • Liability of principals for torts • Must have master-servant relationship, not independent contractor • Liable for torts of servants in scope of employment • Scope = doing master’s work • Doctrine of respondeat superior-let the master answer • Not liable for torts committed while on frolic

  17. Liability of Principals for Agents’ Conduct • Case 18.4 Faverty v. McDonald’s Restaurant of Oregon, Inc.(1995) • Why would a restaurant association have an interest in the outcome of the case? • Case 18.5 Lange v. National Biscuit Co.(1973) • What test does the court give for determining scope of employment?

  18. Liability of Principals for Agents’ Conduct • Principles are generally not liable for the torts of Independent Contractors. • Exceptions: • Inherently dangerous activities • Negligent hiring of independent contractor • Principal provided specifications for project or Job

  19. Termination of theAgency Relationship • Ending an Agency Relationship • Definite duration of time • Agent quits/is fired • Principal dies/is incapacitated • Need to give public or constructive notice (trade publication) • Also give actual notice (letters) • Without notice, agent will have lingering apparent authority

  20. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • Meaning of Employment at Will • Has no definite ending date • Usually there is no formal written contract • Used to be they could be fired at any time • Courts now afford some protection

  21. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Do’s and Don’ts of Firing Employees • Do • Conduct regular reviews of employees, using objective, uniform measures of performance. • Don't • Make oral promises of job security to employees who might later be laid off. • Danger: Breach of contract suit

  22. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Do’s and Don’ts of Firing Employees • Do • Give clear, business-related reasons for any dismissal, backed by written documentation when possible • Don't • Put pressure on an employee to resign in order to avoid getting fired • Danger: Coercion suit

  23. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Do’s and Don’ts of Firing Employees • Do • Seek legal waivers from older workers who agree to leave under an early-retirement plan, and make sure they understand the waiver terms in advance • Don't • Make derogatory remarks about any dismissed worker, even if asked for a reference by a prospective employer • Danger: Defamation suit

  24. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Do’s and Don’ts of Firing Employees • Do • Follow any written company guidelines for termination, or be prepared to show in court why they're not binding in any particular instance • Don't • Offer a fired employee a face-saving reason for the dismissal that's unrelated to poor performance • Danger: Wrongful discharge suit

  25. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Implied Contract • In some states personnel manuals will be a contract if employees rely on its procedures

  26. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • Case 18.6 Guz v. Bechtel (2000) • Is Guz correct that implied contract rights override legitimate business reasons? • What does Guz say is the relationship between good performance and the employer’s right to terminate employees at will?

  27. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • The Public Policy Protection—Whistle-Blowers • Whistle Blower Protection Act of 1978 • False Claims Act • Protection for Whistle-Blowers—The Anti-retaliation Statutes • Passed in many states and by federal agencies • Prohibit firing, demotion, reprimands, and pay cuts of employees who report conduct of their employers

  28. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • Protection for Whistle-Blowers—The Anti-retaliation Statutes • Federal level—Energy Reorganization Act affords protection for employees involved in nuclear work • Whistle-Blowing for Both Employers and Employees • Many companies have created a peer review process for termination and other actions against employees

  29. Termination of Agents Under Employment at Will • Case 18.7 Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.(1996) • Does this case create an affirmative legal duty for helping those in danger? • Can an employee in Washington be fired for assisting a citizen who is a crime victim?

  30. Agency Relationships in International Law • Pitfalls of Complex Global Organizations • Complex interrelationships often evade the law • Example: BCCI and its complex structure • Disclosure of interrelationships becomes important for conflicts, compliance

More Related