1 / 18

AIACC African Workshop Dakar, Senegal, March 2004

Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in the Berg River Basin, South Africa. Group AF-47 Daan Louw, Molly Hellmuth, Mac Callaway, Jabavu Nkomo, Debbie Sparks. AIACC African Workshop Dakar, Senegal, March 2004. ERC

cutter
Télécharger la présentation

AIACC African Workshop Dakar, Senegal, March 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Capacity Building in Analytical Tools for Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in the Berg River Basin, South Africa Group AF-47 Daan Louw, Molly Hellmuth, Mac Callaway, Jabavu Nkomo, Debbie Sparks AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004 ERC Energy Research Centre

  2. Participating Organisations • Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa • Department of Water Resources, Banjul, The Gambia • UNEP- Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development, Denmark ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  3. Cape Town The Project Areas… The Gambia The Berg River Basin, South Africa ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  4. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:The Context • The Berg River basin provides water to both the Cape Town urban center and a variety of irrigation crops. • In 1999, the managed demand on the dams of the Western Cape System was 457 MCMs/a compared to the yield of about 442 MCMs • Winter rainfall region: April – September, need for storage capacity, farm dams and other large • The decision to build the Berg River dam is controversial – is it needed? • The impact of climate change was not considered in the dam feasibility assessment • The total (holistic) economic impact of building new dams – not considered • The impact of the new National Water Act (1998): a major push to create water markets in South Africa (there is provision for water trading, a reserve) ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  5. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Objectives • Estimate the potential impacts of alternative climate change scenarios on water supply and demand in the basin due to changes in runoff, evapotranspiration and surface evaporation, • Translate these physical impacts into monetary losses(or gains) for different groups of farmers and urban water users, • Estimate and compare the benefits costs of the storage and water market options (‘adaptations’) of avoiding climate change damages under different climate scenarios • Estimate the risk of making ex-ante planning decisions with different than expected ex-post climate outcomes ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  6. The Berg River Basin, South Africa: Schematic ADAPTATION OPTIONS MANAGEMENT/INVESTMENT DECISIONS COSTS/BENEFITS ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  7. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Schematic ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  8. Climate • HAD A2* GCM Reference (1961 –1990), Near (2010-2039) and Distant (2070-2099) future time periods ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  9. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Schematic ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  10. Preliminary Impact Results • This CC scenario results in a decrease in runoff over the basin • An increase in Potential EvapoTranspiration losses • Higher crop-water use; Higher Evaporation Potential from Storage ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  11. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Schematic, cont… ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  12. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Economic Model • Upper Berg River Spatial Equilibrium Model is an optimisation model that will simulate: • Competition for water between urban and agricultural water use over space and time • Ex-ante investment in additional reservoir capacity • Ex-post reservoir operation to meet urban, agricultural and environmental demands for water • Objective function is based on economic efficiency, but model can also simulate alternative allocation systems. ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  13. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Adaptation Options • Consider specifically: • Markets– develop a system of water rights • More storage (at an economically optimal level)– collective autonomous adaptation– by farmers and/or government • Marginal costs of environmental “reserve” flow • Scenarios: • Current climate • Climate Change Scenarios (downscaled GCM, “what if”) • Partial Adjustment (reservoir capacity and institutions fixed, farm and reservoir management variable) • Full adjustment (reservoir capacity and institutions are also variable, partially and in combination) ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  14. The Berg River Basin, South Africa: Schematic ADAPTATION OPTIONS MANAGEMENT/INVESTMENT DECISIONS COSTS/BENEFITS ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  15. The Berg River Basin, South Africa:Evaluating Costs and Benefits • COSTS (over 30 year time period): • Changes in farm production costs • Changes in investment costs for new capacity • Changes in administrative costs associated with water market transfers • BENEFITS: • Changes in willingness to pay for water by farmers and urban users (PV) – efficiency increases • Benefit of delay in new storage ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  16. Conclusions • The methodology allows us to: • Estimate climate change damage without the alternatives (additional storage capacity, water markets, both) and • Estimate benefits and costs associated with reducing climate change damages for each alternative for each and multiple climate change scenarios • Determine the optimal storage capacity for each and multiple climate change scenarios • Estimate the cost of making ex-ante decisions about reservoir capacity, if the climate change scenario turns out to be wrong ex-post • Minimizing the cost of making these mistakes • Preliminary impacts results indicate an expected reduction in runoff, which will exacerbate the existing water scarcity ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

  17. End Thank you, for more information contact: Jabavu@energetic.uct.ac.za Debbie@energetic.uct.ac.za Molly.hellmuth@risoe.dk Mac.callaway@risoe.dk Daan@dfpt.co.za Or, please visit: http://www.start.org/project_pages/aiacc.html ERC Energy Research Centre AIACC African WorkshopDakar, Senegal, March 2004

More Related