1 / 12

Dundee Elected Members on Scrutiny (2) What is Scrutiny?

Dundee Elected Members on Scrutiny (2) What is Scrutiny?. Colin Mair, Chief Executive Improvement Service. Scrutiny. To examine To question: Hold to account To Challenge To ensure decisions are implemented To seek an explanation To make clear….transparent. So…What Are We Looking At?.

Télécharger la présentation

Dundee Elected Members on Scrutiny (2) What is Scrutiny?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dundee Elected Members on Scrutiny (2)What is Scrutiny? Colin Mair, Chief Executive Improvement Service

  2. Scrutiny • To examine • To question: Hold to account • To Challenge • To ensure decisions are implemented • To seek an explanation • To make clear….transparent

  3. So…What Are We Looking At? • Proposals for policy & service development • Proposals for spending & investment • Implementation of decisions • Performance of services or functions • Performance of partnerships; ALMOS and joint ventures • Citizens experience/issues with services • Risk, liability & sustainability • Assessments from external scrutiny • Levels and points for scrutiny

  4. Points • No member could possibly scrutinise everything (committees, portfolios) • Members could not do it for themselves (support, trust of officers) • Members make decisions and scrutinise them (administrations, oppositions, cabinet assembly) • Public accountability (1) – explanation; evidence; responsiveness • Public accountability (2) – meeting statutory requirements including Best Value

  5. The D.M and Scrutiny Process • Post mortem model: After the fact; retrospective accountability; scrutiny follows decision making • Continuous improvement model: Dynamic scrutiny across the policy development, decision making and implementation cycle Scrutiny vs Audit

  6. Scrutiny in Practice Means… Policy Proposals Learning From External Scrutiny Spending Decisions Governance & Accountability Implementation/ Delivery Risk & Liability Performance In Practice Customer Experiences

  7. Who is Scrutinising Whom, For What Purpose • Administration scrutinised by opposition • Officers scrutinised by elected members • Council services scrutinised by service users • Council services scrutinised by auditors and inspectors • Elected members scrutinised by voters • Focus on people vs focus on quality of decision and delivery

  8. The Political Business: Process • Pre:pre-agenda: Context, issues and broad options • Pre-agenda: Developed proposals and options: All party briefing • Decision making: Committee and council • Scrutiny: Basis for decisions, implementation, impact, value and propriety (NB. Audit/Scrutiny split) ‘No surprises’ principle Support for members across process: Planned and resourced

  9. Improving Scrutiny & Decision Making – The Pre Pre Agenda • To agree context/ issues/ broad options that should be further developed • Avoid wasting members/ officers time • Give more in-depth understanding to members of the background to allow fuller scrutiny of developed proposals • Open & restricted seminars/ party group briefings/ briefing portfolio holders

  10. The Pre Agenda • Occurs once developed proposals exist • To work well needs a good pre pre agenda stage • Need to ensure members input is built in to proposals – legitimate democratic role • Should have challenge & testing of proposals built in before they go further

  11. Mechanisms • Inclusive or exclusive seminars • Party group briefings • M/O working groups, strategy or review groups • Scope for factual clarification: Pre-agenda Council • Demarcation of scrutiny roles: Committees; audit performance; MMW and improvement

  12. End Points • Scrutiny applies across the political process • Different mechanisms at different levels are appropriate • All members duty

More Related