1 / 10

CARL Workshop Antwerp

CARL Workshop Antwerp. Results of the Country Studies FINLAND. Processes of SI before the DiP. Object of SI in Finland spent fuel Scope of SI: site investigation/selection Subject of dialogue : mostly socio-economical and environmental aspects. Processes of SI before the DiP.

cyrus-ray
Télécharger la présentation

CARL Workshop Antwerp

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CARL WorkshopAntwerp Results of the Country Studies FINLAND

  2. Processes of SI before the DiP • Object of SI in Finland • spent fuel • Scope of SI: site investigation/selection • Subject of dialogue: mostly socio-economical and environmental aspects Finland

  3. Processes of SI before the DiP • Site selection process in Finland: • General geological studies (1980–1982) • Identification of regional bedrock blocks (1983) • Identification of investigation areas (1984)  101 + 1 potential investigation areas (1985) • 5 areas for preliminary site investigations (1987) • 3 areas for detailed site investigations (1993–2000) (Loviisa as a new site in 1997) • selection of Olkiluoto area in Eurajoki (1999) Finland

  4. Processes of SI before the DiP • Processes of SI in Finland: - EIA process 1997-1999 (EIA Act 1994) - implementation by Posiva - MTI the competent authority - focus on four candidate municipals - EIA report an appendix of the DiP application- Decision in Principle (DiP) (Nuclear Energy Act 1987) - implementation by MTI - local right of veto - public hearing, focus on Eurajoki in 1999-2000 - DiP by the Government, ratified by Parliament - Vuojoki negotiations in Eurajoki (the late 1990’s) - between Eurajoki, TVO and Posiva - informal process - agreement on compensation - Vuojoki Foundation Finland

  5. Stakeholder Identification • Case Eurajoki: Step-wise identity finding process- 1970’s: before construction of NPP started TVO promised to transport radwaste away from Eurajoki- 1980: as a part of planning of Olkiluoto TVO gave an undertaking not to implement final disposal in Kaalo - 1992: opponents wanted to sharpen the negative statement already expressed in the communal report of Eurajoki - 1993: supporters wanted to get rid of the statement - 1994: negative statement voted away  neutralization- 1995: co-operation agreement between Eurajoki and TVO- 1996: Posiva’s wish: advantages of an earlier decision- 1997: further development of the prerequisites for the cooperation discussed between the parties- 1998: Vuojoki work group established, the Olkiluoto vision of Eurajoki  Eurajoki willing to have the repository and the new NPP- 1999: Vuojoki agreement on compensation- 2000: the approval of DiP by the municipal council of Eurajoki Finland

  6. Re-Framing process • Technocratic  [crisis]  Socio-technical -1984-1986: TVO’s experiences in Lavia and Ikaalinen closer contacts with local authorities- 1993-1995: focus on three sites“the demand to bring ‘engineering knowledge’ closer to the people is justified…”  more information to the local public - 1996-1997: implementation of EIA process more interaction with the local public Finland

  7. Current Framing • The dominant themes at moment in Eurajoki- construction of the new NPP in Olkiluoto- construction of the ONKALO (underground rock characterization and research facility) started 2004- renovation of the Vuojoki Manor, opened this autumn • Current SI program (after the DiP)- Vuojoki Foundation- interaction group between the municipality of Eurajoki and Posiva - informing the local public (e.g. “Posiva Investigates”) Finland

  8. Overview Finland • Step-wise process in Eurajoki • Informal negotiations of Eurajoki, TVO and Posiva regarding the site selection and economic compensation • EIA process a sidetrack Finland

  9. Concluding Remarks • Informal contacts between the parties • Possible negotiations about the economic compensation • Effectiveness of public participation in decision-making regarding waste management Finland

  10. CARL WorkshopAntwerp Results of the Country Studies FINLAND

More Related