1 / 9

HOM Conference on HRIA in Practice, Zandvoort 23 – 24 November 2006

HOM Conference on HRIA in Practice, Zandvoort 23 – 24 November 2006. Indicators relating to influence of development cooperation on democracy and human rights – example Vietnamese-Swedish co-operation Marcel Zwamborn – mZet research and advice – Utrecht, The Netherlands

dagan
Télécharger la présentation

HOM Conference on HRIA in Practice, Zandvoort 23 – 24 November 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HOM Conference on HRIA in Practice, Zandvoort 23 – 24 November 2006 Indicators relating to influence of development cooperation on democracy and human rights – example Vietnamese-Swedish co-operation Marcel Zwamborn – mZet research and advice – Utrecht, The Netherlands + 31 30 251 03 83 – solon@euronet.nl

  2. Outline • What were the expected results of the exercise? • How did this work out in practice? • What type of indicators have been developed? • What will be done with these results?

  3. Expected results: background • Framework: country strategy Swedish – Vietnamese development co-operation 2004 – 2008 • Purpose: assess effects of Swedish – Vietnamese development co-operation on democracy and human rights • Indicators: based on international human rights standards • Sectors: health, decentralisation/local authority, legal

  4. Expected results: key questions • Identify a set of relevant rights in each area as given in the international standards on human rights • Suggest measurable quantitative/ qualitative indicators in relation to these sets of rights, • Assess progress in each sector and identify contribution to progress of Swedish development co-operation.

  5. Practice: process • Inputs from experts on key questions (rights sets, indicators) • Joint Swedish – Vietnamese working groups for each sector to develop indicators • Three sectoral assessments on the basis of indicators • One synthesis report

  6. Practice: challenges • Identification of sets of rights: rights and development conceptual incongruence? • Operationalisation of measurable RBA related indicators: what are key issues to measure? • Measuring: data and baselines available?

  7. Conceptual incongruence?

  8. Operationalisation of indicators • Content and political will: standards and policy • Target groups: vulnerable groups and non-discrimination • Participation and transparency: process • Enforcement: remedies and redress

  9. Preliminary results • Exercise more complicated than expected: translation of development goals into sets of rights, covering all elements of obligations, etc. • Indicators worked for assessment of achievements in sectors, but evidence shows large gaps: no baseline, no data • Attribution difficult, also in view of conflicting trends in donor policies: wish for attribution, at the same time donor consortia, focus on large programs • Joint ownership of process in crucial to address above points.

More Related