1 / 44

TRENDS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE

TRENDS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE. ARE CHILD ABUSE AND PARTNER ABUSE INCREASING? WHAT EXPLAINS THE TRENDS? WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FOR SOCIETY?. REPORTED AND CONFIRMED CASES OF CHILD ABUSE, IRELAND 1984-1997. VIOLENCE AGAINST PARTNERS.

dai
Télécharger la présentation

TRENDS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TRENDS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE ARE CHILD ABUSE AND PARTNER ABUSE INCREASING? WHAT EXPLAINS THE TRENDS? WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FOR SOCIETY?

  2. REPORTED AND CONFIRMED CASES OF CHILD ABUSE, IRELAND 1984-1997

  3. VIOLENCE AGAINST PARTNERS

  4. PARTNER VIOLENCE BY MEN HAS DECLINED, BUT WITH AN IMPORTANT EXCEPTION, NOT BY WOMEN National Family Violence Surveys (Straus and Gelles 1990b) show a decrease in public acceptance of men slapping their wives (Figure 1) and a decrease in the rate of severe assaults on women by male partners (Figure 2). The National Crime Victimization Surveys a similar pattern of decline in rates of IPV (Figure 3). Uniform Crime Reports (FBI) Homicide of intimate partners has also decreased (Figure 4). Prevention steps probably had a substantial cumulative effect. However, no direct evidence

  5. SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN

  6. Finkelhor & Jones, 1992

  7. Finkelhor & Jones, 1992

  8. TRENDS IN CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 39% DECREASE IN THE USA IN THE 1990s 150,000 in 1992 to 92,000 in 1999 (Jones, Finkelhor, & Kopiec, 2001) SIMILAR DECREASES IN OTHER COUNTRIES Canada Great Britain Sweden Australia New Zealand Spain Israel ALL ABOVE ARE ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Example reports to USA state Child Protective Services COULD REFLECT CHANGE IN PUBLIC WILLINGNESS TO REPORT OR AGENCY WILLINGNESS TO CONFIRM NEED FOR INDEPENDENT DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEYS

  9. RATES STILL EXTREMELY HIGH(Annual Prevalence) • PHYSICALLY ABUSED CHILDREN • Cases known to State Agencies: 500,000 per yr • Cases uncovered in NFVS surveys: 1,500,000 per yr • PHYSICALLY ABUSED WOMEN • Cases reported in NVAW surveys: 1,300,000 • Cases reported in NFVA surveys: 6.000,000

  10. WHAT EXPLAINS THE DECREASE? NINE OF THE MANY PROCESSES

  11. REASON #1: THE CIVILIZATION EFFECT (N. Elias)

  12. REASON #2: PROGRAMS TO END CHILD ABUSE AND WIFE BEATING. THE TYPES OF FAMILY VIOLENCE THAT HAVE BEEN THE FOCUS OF PREVENTION EFFORTS DECREASED THE MOST

  13. REASON 3: CULTURAL NORMS TOLERATING PARTNER ASSAULT HAVE CHANGED

  14. REASON #4 GREATER EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN

  15. REASON #5OTHER CHANGES IN FAMILYCOMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION • LATER AGE AT MARRIAGE • LATER AGE AT FIRST CHILD (FOR PEOPLE MARRING AT THE SAME AGE) • FEWER CHILDREN • GREATER ACCEPTABILITY OF DIVORCE

  16. REASON #6: THE RULE OF LAW COMES TO THE FAMILY PROBABILITY OF ASSAULTING A PARTNER BY PERCEIVED PROBABILITY OF BEING ARRESTED (Ramirez, 2003) NEW LAWS AND POLICE POLICY

  17. Summary • Perceived consequences of certainty of informal and formal sanctions make a difference • Severity of punishment makes little difference • Informal sanctions make more diffeence than legal sanctions • No significant differences were found between men and women in perceived certainty and severity of consequences.

  18. REASON #7 THE DECREASE IN USE OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT

  19. SWEDISH YOUTH CRIME AND PROBLEMS SINCE 1979 BAN *. CRIME RATES DECREASED Seeming exception of assaults reflects redefinition of bullying as assault and enforcement of zero tolerance* ALCOHOL AND DRUG USE DECREASED* SUICIDE DECREASED

  20. VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN SINCE 1979 BAN: * PUBLIC APPROVAL OF CP DECLINED TO NEAR ZERO *.USE OF CP DECLINED SHARPLY BUT CONTINUES * REPORTS OF MINOR ASSAULTS BY PARENTS (CP) INCREASED, AS INTENDED * SEVERE ASSAULTS ON CHILDREN (CHILD ABUSE) HAVE NOT INCREASED * CHILD ABUSE DEATHS LOWEST IN THE WORLD

  21. NATIONS AROUND THE WORLD AREMAKING SPANKING ILLEGALBUT VERY SLOWLY AND WITH WIDELY VARYING IMPMLIMENTATION Sweden 1979 Norway 19 Denmark Finland Italy India – 2 states 2003 s

  22. WHY ENDING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT COULD BE A MAJOR PART OF THE EXPLANATION

  23. REASON #8 LESS ECONOMIC STRESS

  24. BETTER EDUCATED PARENTS ARE LESS LIKELY TO BELIEVE THAT"WHEN A BOY IS GROWING UP, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR HIMTO HAVE A FEW FISTFIGHTS REASON #9 BETTER EDUCATEDPOPULAT-ION EDUCATED PEOPLE ARE MORE LIKELY TO REALIZE THAT FEW THINGS HAVE SIMPLE CAUSES AND SIMPLE SOLUTIONS – LIKE VIOLENCE IN 1968, 75% OF THE ADULT POPULATION AGREED1995 GALLUP DISCIPLINE SURVEY (N=1000)CP\CHARTS\RATES\AGE95G2

  25. THESE ARE JUST NINE OF THE MANY CHANGES MAKING FOR A LESS VIOLENT WORLD, INCLUDING LESS FAMILY VIOLENCE • HISTORICAL TREND AWAY FROM PERSONAL VIOLENCE • PROGRAMS TO END CHILD ABUSE, WIFE BEATING, BULLYIIN • CHANGE IN CULTURAL NORMS TOLERATING FAMILY VIOLENCE • GROWTH IN EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN • OTHER CHANGES IN FAMILY COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION • APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF LAW TO THE FAMILY • DECREASE IN USE OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT • LESS ECONOMIC STRESS • BETTER EDUCATED POPOPULATION • THE CIVILIZATION EFFECT

  26. THE FUTURE OF FAMILY VIOLENCE • * PREDICTING THE FUTURE IS ALWAYS RISKY • Parking lots in New York • * ALL FORMS OF FAMILY VIOLENCE WILL CONTINUE TO DECREASE • * THERE WILL BE UPS AND DOWNS AROUND THE TREND LINE • Some groups may experience increases, such as those suffered by inner city families during the crack cocaine epidemic • THE BENEFITS WILL BE ENORMOUS • For individuals, less: mental illness, unhappy marriages, divorce, higher IQ, more education, better job performance, etc, etc. • For society, Lower: rates of all types of crime, lower costs for criminal justice and welfare, higher economic productivity, etc. • A HEALTHIER, WEALTHIER, AND WISER SOCIEITY

More Related