180 likes | 308 Vues
This report outlines the disruption analysis methodology of the Connecticut Behavioral Health Program (CT BHP) as of February 10, 2006. It details the process of pulling paid claims and varying time frames, inquiries made, and complaints received regarding provider enrollment and client care continuity. After extensive outreach and resource consultation, upcoming steps include comparisons of providers against DCF contract lists and the implementation of a phased approach for treatment authorization based on levels of care, effective February 1, 2006, with detailed processes for inpatient and acute care.
E N D
Report to the Transitional Sub-Committee February 10, 2006
Disruption Analysis Methodology • Pulled paid claims from MCO’s • Slight variation in time frames (i.e., 8/1/05-10/31/05; 8/1/05-11/30/05) • Claims lag, possibly reflecting 1st or 2nd Quarter information • Anticipate that many clients now would now have completed episode of care
Disruption Analysis cont’d • 15 inquiries, no complaint filed, referrals given • 4 complaints • 2 closed • provider enrolling • member choosing to continue in care • 2 open • provider enrolling • no application located at EDS
Disruption Analysis Providers Clients
Drilldown(Unable to Locate, further research occurring ) Providers Clients
Drilldown(Decline) Providers Clients
CT BHP Activity • Over 1000 outreach calls to providers • Consulted the following resources: • Yellow and white pages • ValueOptions commercial provider file
Additional Resources Reviewed • http://www.dph.state.ct.us • http://www.ct-clic.com • http://www.ctnurses.org • http://www.ctmedicalprogram.com • http://www.physicians.dph.state.ct.us • http://www.schoolnurse.vserver.com/ • http://connecticut.uscity.net • http://www.vnasc.org • http://www.yellowbook.com • http://therapists.psychologytoday.com/ • http://connecticut.uscity.net
Next Steps • Will compare providers against DCF contract list • Continue to work with EDS (performer not enrolled) • Manually check for: • Additional phone numbers • Providers embedded in group practice (10%)
A Phased in Approach to Authorization Based on Level of Care • Residential and Group Home Treatment • Inpatient/Acute Levels of Care (23 hour observation, inpatient, PRTF) • Intermediate Levels of Care (Resi Detox, Partial Hospital, Intensive Outpatient,Extended Day Treatment) • Home-Based Services (IICAPS, FFT, MST, MDFT) and Outpatient Services
Phase 1RTC and Group Home Authorizations • Effective 2/1/06 • 28 packets received • 19 packets reviewed • 13 authorizations to 10 programs • On-site reviews to be scheduled • Census information collected and entered
Phase 2 Inpatient/Acute Levels of Care Effective March 1, 2006 (New Admissions) • All new members presenting for inpatient/acute levels of care will need to be pre-authorized for service. • These members will also be subject to continued stay reviews (CCR).
Phase 2 Inpatient/Acute Levels of Care – cont’d Effective March 1, 2006 (Members in Care) • Submission of a modified review form for all members in care as of March 1, 2006 • Fax between March1, 2006 – March 15, 2006 • In order to receive an authorization, providers must call on the day of discharge, or by March 15, 2006, whichever is sooner