1 / 11

Privacy Attitudes within Social Media

Privacy Attitudes within Social Media. Andrew Boyd, Kaven Williams, Ron Chin, Scott Densten, Diana Diamond, Chris Morgenthaler. Overview. Privacy, Security and Compliance Current State of Research IUIPC Model Study Design Initial Results Implications of Findings

daktari
Télécharger la présentation

Privacy Attitudes within Social Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Privacy Attitudes within Social Media Andrew Boyd, Kaven Williams, Ron Chin, Scott Densten, Diana Diamond, Chris Morgenthaler

  2. Overview • Privacy, Security and Compliance • Current State of Research • IUIPC Model • Study Design • Initial Results • Implications of Findings • Future Directions for Research • Questions

  3. Privacy, Security and Compliance • This topic sits at the intersection of: • Psychology • Management Theory and Corporate Governance • Economic Social Utility, Social Contract and Social Network Theory • Computer Science • It has an impact on: • Civil and Criminal Statutes • Economic Behaviour • Civil Rights and Freedoms • Systems Architecture and Development • The interplay between ‘Personal’ and ‘Public’ space

  4. Current Research • Various historical models for online privacy attitudes • Many theoretical models- a dearth of empirical studies • Main empirical construct is IUIPC • Internet User Information privacy Concern • IUIPC draws upon Social Contract theory • Presents a theoretical framework based on attitudes and interdependencies towards: • Collection • Control • Awareness of personal information • These dimensions also form some of the principles behind many privacy statutes in North America and Europe.

  5. IUIPC Model • Great for attitudes, not so good for demographics • May be biased towards overstating privacy concerns • Clearly highlights gap between attitudes and behaviours • Our research team extended IUIPC to include a wider range of demographic co-variants(as a precursor to establishing new models for attitudes and behaviours)

  6. IUIPC Model Extensions

  7. Study Design • IUIPC- Internet User’s Information Privacy Concerns • Multi-dimensional attitudinal survey scaled on a Seven Point Likert Scale • Mixed in with behavioural questions about social media membership and usage • Distributed via Pace email, and personal networks of team members • Ran March 1- April 30, 2009 • 481 respondents, 390 completed

  8. Initial Results

  9. Implications of Findings • Leveling of privacy attitudes across age groups • Ambiguities towards trust of social networking sites • Knowledge, experience and comfort lead to increased disclosure • Context Matters- Online Normative Behaviour

  10. Future Directions for Research • Examine forces behind leveling of privacy concerns across age groups • Define ambiguities in trust attitudes towards social networking sites • Discover why ‘familiarity breeds nonchalance’ • Establish the role of context (normative behaviour) in online attitudes and behaviours

  11. Slings and Arrows ?

More Related