1 / 12

120 likes | 272 Vues

The Metric: The easy way. Guido Chincarini Here we derive the Robertson Walker Metric, the 3D Surface and Volume for different Curvatures. The concept is introduced w/o the need of General Relativity to make it simpler and east to understand physically.

Télécharger la présentation
## The Metric: The easy way

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**The Metric: The easy way**Guido Chincarini Here we derive the Robertson Walker Metric, the 3D Surface and Volume for different Curvatures. The concept is introduced w/o the need of General Relativity to make it simpler and east to understand physically. This part after the Curvature Lecture and before the Hubble law and Cosmological redshift. A good book for the General Relativityt is also: Introduction to General relativity by R.Adler, M. Bazin and M. Schiffer, Pub. McGraw-Hill And the superb: Gravitation by W. Misner, S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler Cosmology 2002_2003**The Space**• Hypothesis: • The space is symmetric and, to be more precise: • Homogeneous and isotropic. • If I have a surface embedded in a 3 dimensional space then I write: s2 = r2 ()2 + r2 Sin2()2 • The question is how do I write a similar metric for a 3 dimension space embedded in a 4 dimension space. Obviously I will have to add a r which gives the third dimension of a 3 D curved space in a 4 dimension space. That is I can write the metric as: Cosmology 2002_2003**Metric 3 D curved space**The proper distance between neighbouring points is: s2 = f(r) (r)2+ r2 ()2 + r2 Sin2()2 The fact that the space is symmetric, that is homogeneous and isotropic means that all the surfaces must have the same curvature, that is K=const. For convenience, this does not change the reasoning because of what we stated above (symmetry), we select an equatorial surface, that is we work on a surface for which = /2. Cosmology 2002_2003**The equatorial surface can be written as:**s2 ( = /2 )= f(r) (r)2 + r2 ()2 and the metric is: g11 = f(r) g22 = r2 The Gauss Curvature [The student check]: Cosmology 2002_2003**Must be valid also for a FLAT space**• A flat space has no curvature, that is: K=0 And r becomes the Euclidean distance, in this case we must have: s2 = r2 +r2 2 And with K = 0 we have: f(r) = 1/C we have s2 = 1/C r2 +r2 2 For the two expressions to be the same we must have: C=1 That the value of the function I wrote as f(r) must be: f(r)=1/(1-K r2) Cosmology 2002_2003**Finally I write the metric as:**Cosmology 2002_2003**We make it general by:**• I transform the coordinates using a parameter R(t) which is a function of time. The proper distance and the curvature become adimensional. = r/R(t) and K(t) = k / R2 (t) ; k= +1, 0, -1 • I add an other dimension, the time. In agreement with the Theory of Relativity an event is deifined by the space coordinates and the time coordinate. Therefore I have: r2 = 2 R2(t) and K r2 = K 2 R2 (t) = k 2 Cosmology 2002_2003**I finally have**Cosmology 2002_2003**Area and Volumes – Space Component**Cosmology 2002_2003**=const Equivalent to R=const in 2D embedded in 3D**Cosmology 2002_2003**Euclidean – k=0**Cosmology 2002_2003**K = -1 Flat Minkowski Space**Cosmology 2002_2003

More Related