1 / 30

Computational Thermodynamics

Computational Thermodynamics. 2. Outline. Compound energy formalism Stoichiometric compound Wagner- Schottky model Ionic liquid. Compound energy formalism. A sublattice phase can be envisaged as being composed of interlocking sublattices

danae
Télécharger la présentation

Computational Thermodynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computational Thermodynamics 2

  2. Outline • Compound energy formalism • Stoichiometric compound • Wagner-Schottky model • Ionic liquid

  3. Compound energy formalism A sublattice phase can be envisaged as being composed of interlocking sublattices on which the various components can mix. It is usually crystalline in nature but the model can also be extended to consider ionic liquids where mixing on particular 'ionic sublattices' is considered. Simple body-centred cubic structure with preferential occupation of atoms in the body-centre and comer positions.

  4. Compound energy formalism To work with sublattice models it is first necessary to define what are known as site fractions, y . These are basically the fractional site occupation of each of the components on the various sublattices Where nisis the number of atoms of component i on sublattice s, and Ns is total number sites on the sublattice s.

  5. Compound energy formalism This can be generalised to include vacancies, which are important to consider in interstitial phases Mole fractions are directly related to site fractions by the following relationship

  6. Compound energy formalism Theideal entropy of mixing is made up of the configurational contributions by components mixing on each of the sublattices. The number of permutations which are possible, assuming ideal interchanges within each sublattice, is given by the following equation and the molar Gibbs ideal mixing energy is Vacancies contribute in that equation!

  7. Compound energy formalism

  8. Compound energy formalism The Gibbs energy reference state is effectively defined by the 'end members' generated when only the pure components exist on the sublattice. Envisage a sublattice phase with the following formula (A, B)1: (C, D)1. It is possible for four points of 'complete occupation' to exist where pure A exists on sublattice 1 and either pure B or C on sublattice 2 or conversely pure B exists on sublattice 1 with either pure B or C on sublattice 2.

  9. Compound energy formalism

  10. Compound energy formalism

  11. Compound energy formalism

  12. Compound energy formalism

  13. Compound energy formalism

  14. Compound energy formalism

  15. Compound energy formalism

  16. Compound energy formalism

  17. Compound energy formalism

  18. Stoichiometric compound

  19. Stoichiometric compound Let’s take a look at the sublattice model again: (A,B):(C,D) If we have components A and C only, then sublattices are occupied: (A):(B) what gives as (in this case) a stoichiometric compound AB The Gibbs energy of this kind of compound is usually described as follows:

  20. Stoichiometric compound Database file: PHASE PBTE % 2 1 1 ! CONSTITUENT PBTE :PB : TE : ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,PB:TE;0) 2.98150E+02 -6.50554752E+04+5.45815447E+00*T+GHSERTE#+GHSERPB#; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 !

  21. Wagner-Shottky model Variation of the Gibbs energy of formation of compound within a small composition range can be described by Wagner-Schottky model. The model describes homogeneity range as a function of various types of defects (A,X):(B,Y) • Types of defects: • Anti-site atoms, i.e. B on sublattice for A and A on sublattice for B • Vacancies • Interstitials • A mixture of the above defects

  22. Wagner-Shottky model Interstitial defect: an extra sublattice ! (A)a:(B)b:(Va,A,B)c

  23. Wagner-Shottky model We can find information from the crystal structure. For example, in some phases with B2 structure we have 2 sublattices: one often has anti-site defect, another one vacancies (A,B)1:(B,Va)1 But since both sublattices are identical from the crystallographic point of view, one has to include all defects on both sublatticies (A,B,Va)1:(B,A,Va)1

  24. Wagner-Shottky model Parameters of the model: GA:B – Gibbs energy of formation of pure AB compound GA:A and GB:B – Gibbs energy of formation of pure A and B, respectively, in the crystal structure of AB compound GB:A – must not be use LA,B:A=LA,B:B = LA,B:* - deviation toward B LA:B,A=LB:A,B= L*:A,B- deviation toward A

  25. Wagner-Shottky model Database file PHASE PBTE % 2 1 1 ! CONSTITUENT PBTE :PB,TE : PB,TE : ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,PB:PB;0) 2.98150E+02 1.74091200E+05 +2*GHSERPB#; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,TE:PB;0) 2.98150E+02 0.0 ; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,PB:TE;0) 2.98150E+02 -6.50554752E+04+5.45815447E+00*T+GHSERTE#+GHSERPB#; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,TE:TE;0) 2.98150E+02 1.57960355E+05+2*GHSERTE#; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,PB,TE:*;0) 2.98150E+02 -8.68054056E+04-3.26572670E+01*T; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(PBTE,*:PB,TE;0) 2.98150E+02 0; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 !

  26. Ionic liquid The ionic liquid model is given by (CiVi+)P(AjVj-,Bk0,Va)Q where P and Q are the number of sites on the cation and anion sublattice, respectively. The stoichiometric coefficients P and Q vary with the composition in order to maintain electroneutrality. where viis the valency of ion i. The summation over i is made for all anions, summation over j is made for all cations.

  27. Ionic liquid According to this model, the Gibbs free energy of the liquid phase can be expressed as:

  28. Ionic liquid Database: SPECIES PB+2 PB1/+2! SPECIES TE-2 TE1/-2! PHASE IONIC_LIQ:Y % 2 .0247462 2 ! CONSTITUENT IONIC_LIQ:Y :PB+2 : TE-2,VA,TE : !

  29. Ionic liquid PARAMETER G(IONIC_LIQ,PB+2:TE-2;0) 2.98150E+02 -1.8541625E+04 -2.2751140E+02*T+GHSERPB#+GHSERTE#; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(IONIC_LIQ,PB+2:VA;0) 2.98150E+02 -2977.961+93.949561*T -24.5242231*T*LN(T)-.00365895*T**2-2.4395E-07*T**3-6.019E-19*T**7; 6.00610E+02 Y -5677.958+146.176046*T-32.4913959*T*LN(T)+.00154613*T**2; 1.20000E+03 Y +9010.753+45.071937*T-18.9640637*T*LN(T)-.002882943*T**2+9.8144E-08*T**3 -2696755*T**(-1); 2.10000E+03 N REF0 !

  30. Ionic liquid PARAMETER G(IONIC_LIQ,TE;0) 2.98150E+02 -17554.731+685.877639*T -126.318*T*LN(T)+.2219435*T**2-9.42075E-05*T**3+827930*T**(-1); 6.26490E+02 Y -3165763.48+46756.357*T-7196.41*T*LN(T)+7.09775*T**2-.00130692833*T**3 +2.58051E+08*T**(-1); 7.22660E+02 Y +180326.959-1500.57909*T+202.743*T*LN(T)-.142016*T**2+1.6129733E-05*T**3-24238450*T**(-1); 1.15000E+03 Y +6328.687+148.708299*T-32.5596*T*LN(T); 1.60000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(IONIC_LIQ,PB+2:TE-2,VA;0) 2.98150E+02 3.7254867E+04 -1.6899525E+01*T; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 ! PARAMETER G(IONIC_LIQ,PB+2:TE-2,TE;0) 2.98150E+02 -1.4689488E+04 +9.2350161E-01*T; 3.00000E+03 N REF0 !

More Related