1 / 30

Implications of NuTeV Standard Model Test

Implications of NuTeV Standard Model Test. NuTeV – charged, neutral currents induced by neutrinos New measurement of Weinberg angle Possible “New Physics” Beyond Standard Model? Normal (“QCD”) Explanations of NuTeV Anomaly? radiative corrections parton Charge Symmetry Violation

danae
Télécharger la présentation

Implications of NuTeV Standard Model Test

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implications of NuTeV Standard Model Test • NuTeV – charged, neutral currents induced by neutrinos • New measurement of Weinberg angle • Possible “New Physics” Beyond Standard Model? • Normal (“QCD”) Explanations of NuTeV Anomaly? • radiative corrections • parton Charge Symmetry Violation • strange quark momentum asymmetry • nuclear, shadowing corrections Beyond the Standard Model?? “QCD Effects”?? Tim Londergan Nuclear Theory Center, Indiana University PAVI06 Milos, Greece May 16-20, 2006 Supported by NSF PHY- 0244822 In collaboration with Tony Thomas (Adelaide/JLab)

  2. The NuTeV Experiment: charged, neutral currents from neutrino DIS 800 GeV p at FNAL produce pi, K from interactions in BeO target; Decay of charged pi, K produces neutrinos, antineutrinos; Almost pure muon neutrinos; (small νe contamination from Ke3 decay) Only neutrinos penetrate shielding • Dipoles select sign of charged meson: • Determine nu/nubar type NuTeV: Rochester/Columbia/FNAL/Cincinnati/Kansas State/Northwestern/ Oregon/Pittsburgh neutrino collaboration G. Zeller etal, PRL 88, 091802 (02); PR D65, 111103 (02)

  3. SeparateNeutral, Charged-Current Events NuTeV Detector: 18 m long, 690-ton steel scintillator; Steel plates interspersed with liq scintillator, drift chambers Charged current: Track through several plates Large visible energy deposit Neutral current: Short visible track Large missing energy • NuTeV Events: • 1.62 million n • 351,000 • NuTeV event selection: • Large E in calorimeter • event vertex in fiducial volume

  4. The Paschos-Wolfenstein Ratio: Neutrino Total Cross Sections on Isoscalar Target: Paschos & Wolfenstein ( PR D7, 91 (73)): Independent measurement of Weinberg angle, using ratio of total X-sections for neutrinos, antineutrinos on isoscalar target: PW ratio minimizes sensitivity to PDFs, higher-order corrections

  5. The Paschos-Wolfenstein Ratio: • PW Ratio depends on the following assumptions: • Isoscalar target (N=Z) • include only light (u, d) quarks • neglect heavy quark masses • assume isospin symmetry for PDFs • no nuclear effects (parton shadowing, EMC, ….) • no contributions outside Standard Model

  6. NuTeV Determination of Weinberg Angle: • Construct ratios • Individual ratios less dependent on overall normalization • Very precise charged/neutral current ratios: • Different cuts, acceptance: don’t construct PW ratio directly • : depends strongly on Weinberg angle • : weak dependence on Weinberg angle 3σ below SM agree with SM These ratios lead to a NuTeV value for the Weinberg angle: The NuTeV result is ~ 3 σ above very precise value (from EW processes at LEP)

  7. NuTeV Result: 3σ Discrepancy from LEP value NuTeV work at LO in QCD (with improvements) and find s2w(NuTeV)=0.2276±0.0013stat ±0.0006syst ±0.0006th -0.00003(Mt/GeV-175)+0.00032 lnMH/100GeV where s2w=1-M2w/M2z (on-shell) Global fit:s2w= 0.2229 ±0.0004 ~2.8σ discrepancy SM Nuclear effects and ν oscillation explanations very unlikely Corresponds to 1.2% decrease in gL2; This is large compared to precision of EW measurements!

  8. Low Q2 (~10-4 GeV2) atomic PV exp’t in Cs [PRL 82, 2484 (99)] Moller scatt exp’t (E158) at SLAC; Q2~ 0.026 GeV2 [PRL 95, 081601 (05)] NuTeV exp’t, Q2 ~ 20 GeV2 [PRL 88, 091802 (02)] LEP, e+ e- at Z pole, Q2 = MZ2 Qweak, pol e-p at JLab (proposed), “Running” of Weinberg Angle Effective Weinberg angle depends on Q2 Warning: gauge and process dependent parameter E158: Q dependence of Weinberg angle confirmed at 6σ level NuTeV: discrepancy of ~3σ with SM prediction [Czarnecki-Marciano, PRD53, 1066 (96)] Qweak

  9. “New Physics” explanation for NuTeV? • The problem: extremely precise • EW data confirms SM! • Mass, width of Z, W • X-sections, branching ratios • at Z peak [LEP, SLD] • LR and FB asymmetries in e+e- • scattering • new particles must satisfy all • these constraints • EW constraints ~ 0.1% level • [NuTeV ~ 1.2%] • new particles have heavy masses •  Q2 dependence must be slow • “new physics” hard to satisfy • EW constraints! NuTeV

  10. “Designer Particles” I:delicately adjust to fit all existing data • oblique corrections [high mass • scale, couples only to vector • bosons]: parameters constrained • by EW data – can’t fit NuTeV • extra Z’ (unmixed) – possible; • runs into trouble with • latest muon g-2

  11. “Designer Particles” II: More Attempts to fit NuTeV • minimal SUSY loops – No – most have wrong sign; others violate • existing constraints • Leptoquarks (bosons that couple to leptons & quarks): models with • very carefully tuned mass splittings still possible – could be tested at • Tevatron, LHC [Davidson, Gambino etal, J High E Phys 2, 37 (2002)] MSSM, light sleptinos, gauginos Leptoquark (solid); extra gauge bosons (red)

  12. EW Radiative Corrections • EM radiative corrections, process specific to NuTeV, are large • Bremsstrahlung from final state lepton in CC significant correction. • Not present in NC (promotes CC events to higher y so they pass energy cut) • {dRn, dRn, dsin2qW} ≈ {+.0074,+.0109,-.0030} • New calculation of this effect (Diener, Dittmaier, Hollik PR D69, 073005 (04) ) • not yet implemented in analysis • Corrections likely larger than NuTeV estimate D. Yu. Bardin and V. A. Dokuchaeva, JINR-E2-86-260, (1986)

  13. Isospin Violating Corrections to PW Ratio: Changes in PW ratio from isospin violating PDFs: PW Correction  valence parton charge symmetry violation (CSV) parton charge symmetry: CS: (rotation of 180o about “2” axis in isospin space) • We know the origins of parton CSV: • quark mass difference: • Electromagnetic contributions: most important EM effect: n-p mass difference

  14. CSV Contribution to NuTeV Result: Sather: Analytic Quark Model Approximation for Valence Parton CSV. Leads to analytic results (model-dependent) PW Ratio CSV Corr’n using Sather: Rodionov: Sather: CTEQ4LQ: 40% decrease in anomaly! NuTeV: Don’t evaluate PW Ratio! CSV Contrib’n to NuTeV result: • Calculate parton CSV at low (quark model) momentum scale • Evolve up to Q2 of NuTeV exp’t (20 GeV2) • Evaluate with NuTeV functional 30% decrease in anomaly

  15. Phenomenological Parton CSV PDFs MRST PDFs from global fits include CSV for 1st time: Martin, Roberts, Stirling, Thorne [Eur Phys J C35, 325 (04)]: Choose restricted form for parton CSV: 90% conf limit (κ) [f(x): 0 integral; matches to valence PDFs at small, large x] Best fit: κ = -0.2, large uncertainty ! Best fit remarkably similar to quark model CSV calculations ADEL (1994) MRST (2004)

  16. “QED Splitting”: a New Source of Isospin Violation MRST, Eur.Phys.J. 39, 155 (05); Glueck, Jimenez-Delgado, Reya, PRL95, 022002 (05) “QED evolution”, quark radiates photon Evolve in Q2 • qualitatively similar to quark model CSV • QED varied while quarks “frozen” • contributes even if mu = md and Mn= Mp • add to quark model CSV term • increase CSV ~ factor 2 • MRST incorporate QED splitting with PDFs • in global fit to high energy data

  17. Summary, CSV Effects on Weinberg angle • Phenomenology: • MRST global fit  limits valence CSV • -0.8 ≤ κ≤ +0.65 κ = -0.6  remove NuTeV anomaly! • κ = +0.6  anomaly twice as large! • Theoretical estimates: • quark model remove ~1/3 anomaly • “QED splitting” remove ~1/3  at current limits, CSV could produce observable effects (~ 5-6%) in certain reactions 90% confidence limits: MRST global fit to valence CSV

  18. Strange Quark Contributions to PW Ratio: Contribution from strange quarks: s-sbar momentum asymmetry Strange quark normalization: constrained (no net strangeness in nucleon) If s quarks carry more momentum than sbar decrease anomaly Determination of s, sbar quark PDFs: Opposite sign dimuons from neutrinos • CCFR: charge of faster muon determines neutrino or antineutrino; • most precise way to determine s, sbar PDFsCCFR, NuTeV

  19. Analyses of s quark momentum asymmetry • NuTeV: analyzed s, sbar for small x: • Best fit: • Do not enforce normalization condition • NLO treatment of dimuon prod’n • But, from normalization: • If s < sbar for small x, requires s > sbar for large x CTEQ:[Kretzer etal, PRL 93, 041802 (04), Olness etal, Eur Phys J C40, 145 (05)] • Global analysis of parton PDFs  CTEQ6 • Includes CCFR, NuTeV dimuon data • (includes expt’l cuts on dimuons) • Extract “best fit” for s, sbar dist’ns • [enforce s normalization cond’n] • Catani et al. hep-ph/0404240; 0406338 • in NNLO, can generate nonzero momentum asymmetry • find small mom asymmetry < 0 from 3-loop contrib’ns

  20. positive [S-] Results: CTEQ Global fit vs. Bjorken x μ± other • CTEQ: S- > 0, strange asymmetry • decreases NuTeV anomaly; • dimuon data: most sensitive for s PDFs • CTEQ: s contrib’n removes • 0  25% of anomaly -.001 < [S-] < +.004

  21. NuTeV Analysis of s, sbar Quark Dist’n: • Re-analyzed dimuon data: • preliminary analysis [S-] ~ 0 • appears negative • strangeness not conserved? • NLO treatment of dimuon prod’n • NuTeV group: • now using CTEQ PDFs (u,d) • very similar analysis method • acceptance corrections? • fragmentation functions? • charm mass (CTEQ uses HERA data)? Qualitative disagreement between NuTeV/CTEQ, using same data, techniques to extract s, sbar ??

  22. Nuclear Effects ?? NuTeV: All data neutrino DIS on iron Nuclear modification of PDFs: Shadowing EMC Effect Fermi motion …. Miller/Thomas Int J Mod Phys A20, 95 (05): Shadowing effect for NuTeV?? charged leptons: Vector meson dominance nCC events: Miller/Thomas: n shadowing very different from m n NC events: Zo: very small coupling to r  NC shadowing ~ 0 Different shadowing for  account for anomaly?? NuTeV: NO ! • Shadowing low Q2, data much higher Q2 • value very close to SM value (should be quite different in MT scenario) Shadowing: increase NuTeV anomaly?? Nuclear effects in n reactions: Hirai, Kumano, Nagai, PR D71, 113007 (05)

  23. Nuclear Effects (part II) Brodsky, Schmidt, Yang (PR D70, 116003 (04)) Shadowing/Antishadowing ν-A processes • include Pomeron, Odderon, Reggeon effects • obtain both shadowing, antishadowing effects • both constructive, destructive interference • processes modified in different ways Predict greater effect on than Remove ~ 20% of Weinberg angle anomaly Partial contribution along with CSV, s quarks ??

  24. Conclusions: • NuTeV: Measured CC, NC X-sections for on Fe • Large (~ 3σ), surprising discrepancy for • “New Physics” – difficult to fit LEP results, NuTeV “designer particles” unlikely very delicate • “QCD Corrections” to NuTeV measurement?? • radiative corr’ns new calc’n, not in analyses • parton CSV  ~ could remove effect [MRST] • strange quark asymmetry ~ 1-2 σ[CTEQ] • nuclear effects ~ 20%, Brodsky etal (model dependence) NuTeV: no!! • CSV, strangeness at present, most plausible explanations for NuTeV anomaly • small additive contrib’ns from CSV, strangeness, nuclear effects ??

  25. Implications of NuTeV Standard Model Test • NuTeV – charged, neutral currents induced by neutrinos • New measurement of Weinberg angle • Possible “New Physics” Beyond Standard Model? • Normal (“QCD”) Explanations of NuTeV Anomaly? • radiative corrections • parton Charge Symmetry Violation • strange quark momentum asymmetry • nuclear, shadowing corrections Beyond the Standard Model?? “QCD Effects”?? Tim Londergan Nuclear Theory Center, Indiana University PAVI06 Milos, Greece May 16-20, 2006 Supported by NSF PHY- 0244822 In collaboration with Tony Thomas (Adelaide/JLab)

  26. Suppressed sensitive to sin2θw Large radiative corrections, ≈-40% Czarnecki-Marciano,Denner-Pozzorini,Petriello,Ferroglia et al Very low Q2 atomic PV exp’t in Cs JLab: Qweak e-p PV exp’t NuTeV/LEP/ PV MØller/ Qweak E158 at SLAC first measurement of PV in MØller sc. huge luminosity high polarization (~80%) Warning: gauge and process dependent parameter At tree level, APV≈280 10-9 Qweak !!

  27. “QCD Corrections” to the NuTeV Result: ( “Something Old”) Isoscalar Effect (N ≠Z for Fe) Depends only on 2nd moment of light quark valence PDFs (momentum carried by up, down valence quarks) Isoscalar corrrection to PW ratio: NuTeV Isoscalar correction: • NuTeV exp’t doesn’t evaluate PW ratio • Isoscalar correction from Monte Carlo simulation of exp’t • Although NuTeV significant difference from PW corr’n, under control

  28. Qualitative Features of Parton Distributions At low Q2, generate from quark models: “Majority” valence quark: “Minority” valence quark residual (ud) diquark residual (uu) diquark Under CSV n p, residual (ud) diquark residual (dd) diquark [only n-p mass difference] [diquark mass difference] [True for all intermediate states!]

  29. Calculating CSV Corrections to PW Ratio: • Construct models for valence parton distributions • Test how these models behave under CSV transformation: • Predict sign, magnitude of CSV effects in NuTeV exp’t CSV Corrections to PW Ratio: • CSV correction to PW ratio independent of Q2 • Both numerator, denominator involve 2nd moment of valence dist’ns • numerator, denominator evolve identically with Q2 under LO evolution, • Evaluate valence PDFs at low Q2 • Dominated by configurations with 3 valence quarks • Easy to calculate, study behavior

  30. Quantitative Estimates of Parton CSV Quark-model formula for parton PDFs: X = qq; 3q+qbar; 4q+2 qbar. …. Large x: dominated by X=diquark states Sather: study variation with nucleon, quark mass: analytic expression small shift in PDFs, due to quark, nucleon mass. For large x, Sather predicts d > u in both cases. (From normalization, d < u at small x) [work at low Q2 where 3-quark states dominate]

More Related