50 likes | 175 Vues
Uganda has emerged from civil war and economic hardship to a state of relative stability, yet its human rights record is under scrutiny, particularly regarding anti-gay legislation. The upcoming trial of Jackson Mukasa and Kim Mukisa marks a pivotal moment in Uganda's legal history. As international leaders like President Obama condemn Uganda's laws, discussions arise about the implications of sanctions and the moral responsibilities of aid. Should the UK enforce sanctions until Uganda upholds human rights, or could this worsen the country's socio-economic conditions?
E N D
SMSC Global affairs discussion Where Who Why Discuss
Uganda has rebounded from the abyss of civil war and economic catastrophe to become relatively peaceful, stable and prosperous. However its human rights record has been making the news of late. Where…..
WHO In two weeks, 19-year-old Jackson Mukasa and 24-year-old Kim Mukisa will stand trial for engaging in acts “against the order of nature.” Their trial will be the first trial in the history of Uganda’s anti-gay laws, and many fear, not the last.
Why Uganda has passed homophobic laws that make being Gay illegal. In the US, President Obama has consistently condemned this legislation. He says Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni's signature on the anti-gay bill "complicates" the US/Uganda relationship. The US alone gives them $400 million annually, but Uganda has said it doesn't want any aid with moral strings attached. David Cameron also put pressure on Uganda to reject the law. As quoted by the BBC, Cameron said all recipients of UK aid must "adhere to proper human rights."
Discuss The UK should put sanctions on Uganda until they get rid of these laws that go against human rights. However could any sanctions increase poverty and increase intolerance? If you were the prime minister of the UK would you stop giving aid to Uganda until it respected human rights ?