1 / 12

Resurrecting SOWG

The NCBC Scientific Ontologies Working Group convened on April 26, 2012, to identify essential scientific ontologies and ontology-related resources essential for improving data quality and consistency in translational science. This initiative encourages NCBC members to endorse, utilize, or propose modifications to various ontologies. The group also works on creating a centralized portal for ontology development and usage, ensuring that the selected ontologies are actively maintained and improved, while addressing any existing gaps in resources.

danno
Télécharger la présentation

Resurrecting SOWG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Resurrecting SOWG BS, Baltimore, CTS Ontology Workshop April 26 2012

  2. NCBC Scientific Ontologies Working Group Challenge: to identify a set of scientific ontologies and ontology-related resources which can be recommended for purposes of supporting data quality and data consistency in translational science http://na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/ SDIWG:_NCBC_Scientific_Ontologies

  3. http://na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/ PrelimResultsSOWG1 • I – All NCBC's endorse • II – All NCBC's will use under protest (or more often, with a wish for some additions/corrections) • III – promising but under construction • IV – will not use • V – no clear standard • VI – mapping from one ontology to the other. • VII – to be determined

  4. Class I: All NCBC's endorse

  5. Class I: All NCBC's endorse

  6. Class II: All NCBC's will use under protest

  7. Class III: Promising but under construction

  8. Class I: All COnTRA-G's endorse

  9. Class II: All COnTRA-G'swill use under protest

  10. Process: Step 1 All COnTRA-G interested persons list • ontologies they are involved in developing or using • ontologies they know other CTSA persons are developing or using • ontologies they need, or are planning to develop A portal (Bioportal slice?) is created linking to the above, with a request, widely disseminated, that the contents be kept up to date

  11. Process: Step 2 • A candidate set of reference ontologies from this list is identified, which COnTRA-G persons commit to using and improving • Gaps are identified, and the need is announced

More Related