1 / 14

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 37

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 37. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION II: REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY. Buck v. Bell (1927) [CB p. 847]. Majority by: Holmes Joined by: Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Sanford, Stone Dissent by: Butler

darby
Télécharger la présentation

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 37

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAWCLASS 37 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION II: REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY

  2. Buck v. Bell (1927) [CB p. 847] • Majority by: HolmesJoined by: Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Sanford, StoneDissent by: Butler • On far left: Carrie Buck, near left (bottom): Dr James Bell, Superintendent of the VA State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded

  3. Fernald School (The Massachusetts School for Idiotic and Feebleminded Youth) • See The State Boys Rebellion by Michael D’Antonio

  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942) [C p. 849] • Majority by: DouglasJoined by: unanimous courtConcurrence by: Stone (in the judgment of the court only)Concurrence by: Jackson

  5. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) [C p. 850] • Majority by: DouglasJoined by: Warren, Clark, Brennan, GoldbergConcurrence by: GoldbergJoined by: Warren, BrennanConcurrence by: HarlanConcurrence by: WhiteDissent by: BlackJoined by: StewartDissent by: StewartJoined by: Black

  6. Concurrence of Justice Goldberg

  7. Concurrence of Justice Harlan

  8. Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) [C p. 856] • 6-1 • Opinion of the Court by: BrennanJoined by: Douglas, Stewart, MarshallConcurrence by: WhiteJoined by: BlackmunDissent by: BurgerPowell and Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of the case (neither was sworn in in time)

  9. Roe v. Wade (1973) [C p. 859] • The real “Jane Roe” was Norma McCorvey • Wrote autobiographies “I am Roe” (1994), “Won by Love” (1997) • Now a Catholic and supporter of the pro-life movement

  10. Roe’s Lawyers • Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington (pictured, left) • 26 years old when she first argued the case (her first!) before the Supreme Court • Case was argued twice before the Court (unusual) 12/13/1971 and 10/11/1972

  11. Majority Opinion in Roe v. Wade • Written by Justice Blackmun, joined by Justices Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Powell • 2 dissenters (Justices Rehnquist and White (in Doe v. Bolton) • Concurrences by Justice Stewart, Douglas (in Doe v. Bolton) also Burger

  12. WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES (1989) [C p. 865] • 5-4 • Plurality by Reh quist, White and Kennedy • Concurrence by Scalia • Concurrence by O’Connor • Dissenters: Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall, Stevens

  13. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. Casey (1992)[C p. 867] • Plurality by: O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (jointly)Concurrence/dissent by: StevensConcurrence/dissent by: BlackmunConcurrence/dissent by: RehnquistJoined by: White, Scalia, ThomasConcurrence/dissent by: ScaliaJoined by: Rehnquist, White, Thomas

  14. Class on Tuesday • 11-12 • Preemption • Assignment: Reading for Class 23

More Related