1 / 11

UN in Moldova Comparative Advantage in area of Social Protection

UN in Moldova Comparative Advantage in area of Social Protection. Alexandra Yuster UNICEF Moldova Representative. UNDAF. Period: 2013-2017 3 focus areas 8-10 outcomes. UNDAF formulation. Evaluation of previous UNDAF SWOT Analysis Country Assessment Consultations. UN advantages.

dard
Télécharger la présentation

UN in Moldova Comparative Advantage in area of Social Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UN in MoldovaComparative Advantage in area of Social Protection Alexandra Yuster UNICEF Moldova Representative

  2. UNDAF • Period: 2013-2017 • 3 focus areas • 8-10 outcomes

  3. UNDAF formulation • Evaluation of previous UNDAF • SWOT Analysis • Country Assessment • Consultations

  4. UN advantages • UN norms-setting around social protection; • Advocacy role on social issues; • Institutional memory, track record and credibility; • Co-chairmanship with MLSPF of the social protection sector coordination council; • Good cooperation and partnership with local actors; • Ability to link work at the local level with policy level; • Evidence-based policy making; • Field and international expertise.

  5. UN disadvantages • Insufficient influence on other internat. actors; • Limited financial capacity; • Access to/freedom of action in Transnistria; • Capacity substitution vs. capacity development; • Limited progress in supporting civil society to be a more vocal, analytical and visible interlocutor in social protection.

  6. Opportunities • Reforms opportunity for local and central authorities (more efficient use of funds); • New development partners; • EU integration processes; • Open-minded and reforms-oriented Government; • Functioning NGO alliances; • NGOs' growing capacity to monitor and influence social protection issues; • MD/TN Working Group on Social Protection and Humanitarian Aid.

  7. Threats • Political instability; • Fragmented and highly liquid public sector; • Reduction of social protection expenditures; • Withdrawal of large bilaterals; • EU integration processes; • Lack of long-term vision of the MoLSPF; • Decentralization; • Lack of framework for NGOs-service providers; • Potential large system shocks.

  8. Work of others • EU: social assistance, labour, occupational safety, integration of migrants; • WB: social assistance, incl. extension of social aid; work on comprehensive monitoring system; pension reform; • IMF: social assistance reforms, pension reforms (?); • OSCE: Domestic violence, gender equality, trafficking, sexual exploitation, minorities; • SIDA: Gender, labour market, local development;

  9. Work of others (2) • CoE: protection of children against sexual exploitation, Roma and other areas • USAID: Human trafficking, child protection (via NGOs), labour market; • SDC: Youth friendly services, child protection • International NGOs/funders: Oak foundation, SOIR, Terre des Hommes, HEKS, Key Stone, Lumos, etc.: Direct service delivery, de-institutionalization, social inclusion.

  10. UN advantages Any views on these?

  11. Thank you!

More Related