90 likes | 186 Vues
This report delves into aligning educational resources with institution's mission, faculty-driven programs, and integrated library resources to enhance student learning experiences for undergraduate and graduate programs.
E N D
Year Three Report andStandard 2 C Cynthia Price, PhD Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs, Seattle Pacific University ALO Workshop NWCCU March 13, 2012
2.C: 1-8 Educational Resources Are SLO’s identified and published for all courses, programs and degrees? Is program creation faculty driven? Is library/learning resources integrated? Experiential learning & transfer credit policy?
2.C: 9-11 Undergraduate Programs • General Education, appropriate breadth and number of credits Identifiable outcomes for certain academic skills GE has identifiable & assessable SLO’s stated in relation to institution’s mission (CT’s?) Applied degree & certificate programs – SLO’s
2.C: 12-15 Graduate Programs Consistent with mission, are in keeping with discipline and professions Learning experiences must be appropriate and assessed Grad programs appropriately prepare students for future profession • 2.C: 16-19 C.E. and Non-Credit Programs Alignment with mission and goals Institutional control and responsibility Assessment for achievement and continual evaluation
To-Do List • Have we assured that mission & CT’s align with curriculum? • Are all SLO’s available and published? • Are all CT indicators finalized? • What data do we still need? • Thinking ahead, does the Year 3 Report prepare us well for the Year 5 Report? • Is the report finished by February 1?