1 / 13

PHILIPPINE REFERENCE SYSTEM OF 1992 (PRS92)

PHILIPPINE REFERENCE SYSTEM OF 1992 (PRS92). A STATUS REPORT. BACKGROUND. PRS92 serves as the country’s standard reference system for all surveys and mapping activities. PRS92 serves as the fundamental component of the country’s spatial data infrastructure.

daria-downs
Télécharger la présentation

PHILIPPINE REFERENCE SYSTEM OF 1992 (PRS92)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHILIPPINE REFERENCE SYSTEM OF 1992 (PRS92) A STATUS REPORT

  2. BACKGROUND • PRS92 serves as the country’s standard reference system for all surveys and mapping activities. • PRS92 serves as the fundamental component of the country’s spatial data infrastructure. • The role of PRS92 is to provide the medium through which data sets that are used for planning and those generated through the implementation of the different multi-sectoral programs and projects can be inter-related geographically.

  3. LEGAL BASES OF PRS92 E.O. 45, s. 1993 Transition Period : Until 2000 E.O. 280, s. 2000 Transition Period : Until 2005 E.O. 321, s. 2004 Transition Period : Until 2010

  4. Prior to the issuance of EO 321, series of 2004, NAMRIA organized two (2) major events. STAKEHOLDERS’ CONFERENCE ON PRS92 August 15, 2003 The New Philippine Army Officers’ Clubhouse Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City

  5. SOUTH LUZON VIZAYAS MINDANAO NORTH LUZON FOCUSED GROUP DISCUSSIONS ON PRS92 • METRO MANILA February 19-20, 2004 NCR, Regions 4A, 4B, and 5 • CEBU February 23-24, 2004 Regions 6, 7 and 8 • DAVAO February 26-27, 2004 Regions 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 • BAGUIO March 1-2, 2004 CAR, Regions 1,2 and 3

  6. Results and Findings(Situationer)

  7. 1ST Order 2nd Order 3rd Order ESTABLISHMENT / DENSIFICATION OF CONTROL POINTS NAMRIA: 1ST ORDER TOTAL TARGET 330 ACCOMP. 330 (31 Lost) VARIANCE 31 2ND ORDER 654 215 (13 Lost) 426 3RD ORDER 3,463 750 2,713 % Accomplishment: 29% LMS/LMB: TOTAL 105,090 Geodetic Control Points ACCOMP. 6,750 (3RD and 4TH Order) VARIANCE 98,340 % Accomplishment: 6.42%

  8. INTEGRATION OF SURVEYS/MAPS/PLANS • NAMRIA: • ALL 1:10,000 TOPO MAPS ARE ALREADY IN PRS92. • CONVERSION OF 1:50,000 AND 1:250,000 MAPS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MAPS ONGOING. • 17.6% OF LAND CLASSIFICATION MAPS HAD BEEN INTEGRATED INTO PRS92. • ALL NEW SURVEYS AND THEMATIC MAPS IN PRS92. • LMS/LMB: • INTEGRATION OF CADASTRAL SURVEYS AND MAPS INTO PRS92 IS BARELY UNDERTAKEN. NO COMPLETE INTEGRATION OF CADASTRAL SURVEYS AND MAPS WAS EVER MADE ON A SINGLE MUNICIPALITY.

  9. OTHER COMPONENTS IN THE LMS OTHER IMPORTANT COMPONENTS SUCH AS MONUMENT RECOVERY, NETWORK MAINTENANCE, R & D, IEC AND TRAINING WERE BARELY UNDERTAKEN. LOGISTICS THERE IS INADEQUATE SURVEYING EQUIPMENT, COMPUTER HW AND SW AND COMPETENT PERSONNEL. BUDGET IS LIMITED. PROJECT MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE IS INADEQUATE. AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL, NO PARTICULAR PERSON OR OFFICE WAS DESIGNATED TO ASSUME OVERALL SUPERVISION, COORDINATION AMONG IMPLEMENTING UNITS IS MINIMAL.

  10. SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND CONCERNS (STAKEHOLDERS’ CONFERENCE) Serious backlog in densification and integration of existing ENR maps, plans, surveys into PRS 92 • (a) inadequate funds (less priority); • (b) inadequacies in current implementing structure/mechanisms/strategies; • (c) inadequate policies/guidelines; • (d) non-compliance by implementing units; • (e) inadequate qualified manpower complement/inadequate training; • (f) doubtful set of transformation parameters; and • (g) implications of the adoption of PRS92 to land titling and registration system.

  11. SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND CONCERNS (FOCUSED GROUP DISCUSSIONS) There is a serious backlog in implementation and impending failure to comply by the year 2005 deadline. The transition period was extended from 2000 to 2005 without a definite implementation plan and firm budgetary commitment. Further, no particular person or office was mandated to orchestrate, oversee, and monitor the PRS92 program as a whole, hence, the failure.

  12. EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 321(02 July 2004) • DENR originally proposed a transition period up to year 2015; • The Office of the President, however, wanted the end of transition period to coincide with the end of PGMA’s term, i.e., 2010; • EO 321 directs the DENR to allocate the necessary funds, issue implementing guidelines, and designate an office which will oversee the implementation of the Order.

  13. Thank you!

More Related