Kentucky Integrated Strategy

1. Kentucky Integrated Strategy September 29, 2011

2. Offer tools for the implementation of the Common Core State Standards, leading to college & career readiness for students College & Career Readiness Agenda—Literacy/Mathematics Design Collaborative Tools

3. State Strategy

4. 9 Pilot Districts Boone Co. Boyle Co. Daviess Co. Fayette Co. Jefferson Co. Jessamine Co. Kenton Co. Rockcastle Co. Warren Co.

5. Partnership Grant All KY districts through Leadership Networks

6. 12 Integration Districts Daviess County* Fleming County Gallatin County Jackson Independent Jessamine County* Jefferson County* Kenton County* Lee County Owen County Magoffin County Simpson County Washington County * LDC &/or MDC pilot continuation sites State Strategy

7. KY Writing Project Meta- metrics Center for Teacher Quality NBCT/ CCSS SREB Middle Grades Partnership grant for KY Networks Continuation grants for 9 pilots Measured Progress Study Other Gates Supported Work

8. GOALS • Integration districts will build capacity to deploy LDC/MDC tasks and modules • Implement valid & reliable professional growth and evaluation system • Develop delivery plan to track and monitor fidelity of implementation KEY ACTVITIES • Identity and train partner districts/teachers • Support administration in validating system through use of Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) videos and tools Goals and Key Activities: Integration Grant

9. Integration Work: Focus on College/Career Readiness • 3 Year Integrated Strategy • Identify 12 integration districts to implement LDC • tasks and MDC formative assessment lessons at • MS/HS; develop common assignments/assesments • Use observation protocol to identify/provide feedback on effective instructional practices; • field-test and validate teacher effectiveness system using MET tools; • Collect, analyze and use appropriate real time data/ evidence from both teachers and students; • Document via taping using MET technologies Instructional Strategies Teacher & Principal Effectiveness

10. Going Deeper—Integration Work &Teacher and Principal Professional Growth and Evaluation System Teachers want “performance based on factors they can impact directly -- like student growth and student engagement -- and not on factors that fail to consider the realities of individual students in individual classrooms.” --Scholastic survey

11. Connections to Leadership Networks

12. Year 2 Network Focus

13. Design high-quality formative and summative assessmentsand utilize resulting data effectively to improve teaching and learning • Plan rigorous and congruent learning experiences for instruction • Select evidence-based strategies and resources to enhance instruction • Work collaboratively within and across networks to populate CIITS =focus on teaching & learning and more CCR students Deliverables

14. Students and Teachers Matter … • Teacher effectiveness is the dominant factor influencing student academic growth (Sanders, & Rivers, 1996; Wright, Horn, & Sanders, 1997) • An effective teacher is effective with all students (Nye, Konstantopoulos, & Hedges, 2004) • Effective teachers have an extraordinary and lasting impact on the lives of students (Stronge, 2007) Why are we here?

15. Major Milestones

17. Next Steps for Districts

18. Next Steps

19. Grant Outcomes

20. Timeline