1 / 19

Strange Nonchaotic Attractors in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems

Strange Nonchaotic Attractors in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems. Sang-Yoon Kim (KWNU, UMD).  Quasiperiodically Forced Systems. : Irrational No.  Typical Appearance of Strange Nonchaotic Attractors (SNAs). Smooth Torus. SNA (Intermediate State).

darva
Télécharger la présentation

Strange Nonchaotic Attractors in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strange Nonchaotic Attractors in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems Sang-Yoon Kim (KWNU, UMD)  Quasiperiodically Forced Systems : Irrational No.  Typical Appearance of Strange Nonchaotic Attractors (SNAs) Smooth Torus SNA (Intermediate State) Chaotic Attractor Property of SNAs: 1. No Sensitivity to Initial Condition (<0) 2. Fractal Phase Space Structure

  2. Typical Dynamical Transitions in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems Quasiperiodically Forced Logistic Map Phase Diagram • Main Interesting Feature “Tongue,” where Rich Dynamical Transitions Occur: • Route a Intermittency • Route b or c Interior Crisis of SNA or CA • Route d or e Boundary Crisis of Torus or SNA (All These Dynamical Transitions May Occur through Collision with a New Type of “Ring-Shaped Unstable Set.”) Smooth Torus (Light Gray): T and 2T CA (Black), SNA (Gray and Dark Gray)

  3. _ ~ Phase Sensitivity Exponent to Characterize Strangeness of an Attractor  Phase Sensitivity with Respect to the Phase of Quasiperiodic Forcing: MeasuredbyCalculatingaDerivativex/alongaTrajectoryandFindingitsMaximumValue: (Taking the minimum value of N(x0,0) with respect to an ensemble of randomly chosen initial conditions) Phase Sensitivity Function: • Smooth Torus (a=3.38, =0.584 7) N: Bounded  No Phase Sensitivity • SNA (a=3.38, =0.584 75) N ~ N: Unbounded [( 19.5): PSE] Phase Sensitivity  Strange Geometry

  4. Typical Phase Diagrams in Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems Quasiperiodically Forced Hénon Map Quasiperiodically Forced Ring Map Tongues (near the Terminal Points of the Torus Doubling Bifurcation Lines) =0 and b=0.01 b=0.05 (a: Intermittency, b & c: Interior Crisis, d & e: Boundary Crisis)

  5. _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ Intermittent Route to SNAs  Absorbing Area (AA) in the Quasiperiodically Forced Logistic Map M M: Noninvertible [ detDM=0 along the Critical Curve L0={x=0.5}] Images of the Critical Curve x=0.5 [i.e., Lk=Mk(L0): Critical Curve of Rank k]: Used to Define a Bounded Trapping Region inside the Basin of Attraction. The AA determines the Global Structure of a Newly-Born Intermittent SNA. *=0.584 726 781 Smooth Torus inside an AA for a=3.38 and =0.584 7 (x -0.059) Intermittent SNA filling the AA for a=3.38 and =0.584 75 (x -0.012,  19.5)

  6. Global Structure of an Intermittent SNA The Global Structure of the SNA may be Determined by the Critical Curves Lk.

  7. Rational Approximations  Rational Approximation (RA) • Investigation of the Intermittent Transition in a Sequence of Periodically Forced Systems with Rational Driving Frequencies k, Corresponding to the RA to the Quasiperiodic Forcing ( ) : • Properties of the Quasiperiodically Forced Systems Obtained by Taking the Quasiperiodic Limit k .  Unstable Orbits The Intermittent Transition is Expected to Occur through Collision with an Unstable Orbit: •Smooth Unstable Torusx=0 (developed from the unstable fixed point for the unforced case): Outside the AA  No Interaction with the Smooth Attracting Torus • Ring-Shaped Unstable Set (without correspondence for the unforced case) Using the RA, a New Type of Ring-Shaped Unstable Set that Interacts with the Smooth Torus is found inside the AA.

  8. Metamorphoses of the Ring-Shaped Unstable Set • Thekth RA to a Smooth Torus e.g. k=6  RA: Composed of Stable Orbits with Period F6 (=8) inside the AA. • BirthofaRing-ShapedUnstableSet(RUS)viaaPhase-DependentSaddle-Node Bifurcation a=3.246, =0.446, k=6 • RUS of Level k=6: Composed of 8 Small Rings Each Ring: Composed of Stable (Black) and Unstable (Gray) Orbits with Period F6 (=8) (Unstable Part: Toward the Smooth Torus  They may Interact.) • Evolution of the Rings a=3.26, =0.46, k=6 • Appearance of Chaotic Attractor (CA) via Period-Doubling Bifurcations (PDBs) and Its Disappearance via a Boundary Crisis (Upper Gray Line: Period-F6 (=8) Orbits Destabilized via PDBs)

  9. Change in the Shape and Size in the Rings a=3.326, =0.526, k=6 Each Ring:Composedof theLargeUnstable Part (Gray) and a Small Attracting Part (Black) • Quasiperiodic Limit a=3.326, =0.526, k=8 No. of Rings (=336): Significantly Increased Unstable Part (Gray): Dominant Attracting Part (Black): Negligibly Small Expectation: In the Quasiperiodic Limit, the RUS forms a Complicated Unstable Set Composed of Only Unstable Orbits

  10. _ ~ Mechanism for the Intermittency • Smooth Torus (Black) and RUS (Gray) in the RA of Level k=8 (F8=21) a=3.38, =0.586, k=8 a=3.38, =0.586, k=8 • Phase-Dependent Saddle-Node Bifurcation for 8=0.586 366  Appearance of Gaps, Filled by Intermittent Chaotic Attractors  RA to the Whole Attractor: Composed of Periodic and Chaotic (in 21 Gaps) Components Average Lyapunov Exponent < 0 (<x> -0.09) a=3.38, =0.5864, k=8 a=3.38, =0.5864, k=8

  11.  Quasiperiodic Limit • Algebraic Convergence of the Phase-Dependent SNB Values k (up to k=15) to its Limit Value *(=0.584 726 781) of Level k. • A Dense Set of Gaps (Filled with Intermittent CAs) Using This RA, One Can Explain the Intermittent Route to SNA. a=3.38, =0.584 75

  12. Transition from SNA to CA  Average Lyapunov Exponents (in the x-direction) in the RAs <x>= p + c; p(c): “Weighted” Lyapunov Exponents of the Periodic (Chaotic) Component p(c) = <x>p(c)Mp(c); Mp(c): Lebesgue Measure in  and <x>p(c): Average Lyapunov Exponent of the Periodic (Chaotic) Component  Chaotic Transition (c=0.5848) Solid Line: Quasiperiodic Limit Solid Circles: RA of Level k=15

  13. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Other Dynamical Transitions in the Tongues  Interior Crisis Attractor-Widening Interior Crisis Occurs through Collision with the RUS: Route b: SNA (Born via Gradual Fractalization) Intermittent SNA • a=3.4443 • =0.55 • x -0.005  8.0 • a=3.4441 • =0.55 • x -0.018  1.4 Route c: CA Intermittent CA • a=3.43 • =0.48 • x 0.069 • a=3.44 • =0.48 • x 0.124

  14. Boundary Crisis T: Torus, S: SNA, C: CA, D: Divergence, Dashed Line: Birth of SNA via Gradual Fractalization, Solid Line: Transition to Chaos, Dash-Dotted Line: Basin Boundary Metamorphosis Line, Dotted Line: Interior Crisis Line • Boundary Crisis of Type I (Heavy Solid Line) through Collision with the RUS • Route d: Smooth Torus  Divergence • Route e: SNA (Born via Gradual Fractalization)  Divergence Boundary Crisis of Type II (Heavy Dashed Line) through Collision with the Smooth Unstable Torus • Route (): CA (SNA)  Divergence • • Double Crises near the Vertex Points

  15. AppearanceofHigher-OrderTongues Appearance of Similar Higher-Order Tongues Torus (Light Gray) SNA (Gray) CA (Black) (a*=3.569 945 ...) Band-Merging Transitions near the Higher-Order Tongues 2T: Doubled Torus, S & 2S: SNA, C & 2C: CA, Dashed Line: Birth of SNA via Gradual Fractalization, Solid Line: Transition to Chaos, Dash-Dotted Line: Basin Boundary Metamorphosis Line, Dotted Line: Interior Crisis Line • Hard Band-Merging Transition (Heavy Solid Line) via Collision with the RUS • Soft Band-Merging Transition (Heavy Dashed Line) via Collision with an Unstable Parent Torus • Double Crises near the Vertex Points

  16. Summary • Using the RA , the Quasiperiodically Forced Logistic Map has been Investigated: Appearance of a New Type of Ring-Shaped Unstable Sets via Phase-Dependent • Saddle-Node Bifurcations near the Tongues  Occurrence of Rich Dynamical Transitions such as the Intermittency, Interior and Boundary Crises, and Band-Merging Transitions through Interaction with the RUS  Such Dynamical Transitions: “Universal,” in the Sense that They Occur Typically in a Large Class of Quasiperiodically Forced Period-Doubling Systems • Phase Diagram of the Quasiperiodically Forced Toda Oscillator =0.8 and 1=2 S.-Y. Kim, W. Lim, and E. Ott, “Mechanism for the Intermittent Route to Strange Nonchaotic Attractors,” nlin.CD/0208028 (2002).

  17. Basin Boundary Metamorphoses  Main Tongue When the Critical Curve L1 of Rank 1 Passes the Upper Basin Boundary (x=1), “Holes,” Leading to Divergent Trajectories, Appears inside the Basin. a=3.4 =0.58 a=3.43 =0.58  2nd-Order Tongue In the Twice Iterated Map, when the Critical Curve L1 of Rank 1 Passes the Upper Basin Boundary, “Holes,” Leading to an Another Attractor, Appears inside the Basin. a=3.44 =0.14 a=3.45 =0.14

  18. Dynamical Transitions in Quasiperiodically Forced Systems Rich dynamical transitions in the quasiperiodically forced systems have been reported: 1. Transitions from a Smooth Torus to a Strange Nonchaotic Attractor (SNA) 1.1Gradual Fractalization [T. Nishikawa and K. Kaneko, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6114 (1996)] 1.2Torus Collision [J.F. Heagy and S.M. Hammel, Physica D 70, 140 (1994)] 1.3Intermittent Transition [A. Prasad, V. Mehra, and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4127 (1997), A. Witt, U. Feudel, and A. Pikovsky, Physica D 109, 180 (1997)] 1.4Blowout Transition [C. Grebogi, E. Ott, S. Pelikan, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 13, 261 (1984), T. Yalcinkaya and Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5039 (1996)] 2. Crises for the SNA and Chaotic Attractor (CA) 2.1 Band-Merging Crisis [O.Sosnovtseva, U.Feudel, J.Kurths, and A.Pikovsky, Phys.Lett.A 218, 255 (1996)] 2.2 Interior Crisis [A. Witt, U. Feudel, and A. Pikovsky, Physica D 109, 180 (1997)] 2.3 Boundary Crisis [H.M. Osinga and U. Feudel, Physica D 141, 54 (2000)] However, the Mechanisms for such Transitions are Much Less Understood than those in the Unforced or Periodically Forced systems. Illumination of the Mechanisms for the Dynamical Transitions: Necessary

  19. _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ Band-Merging Transition  Band-Merging Transition of Type I through Collision with the RUS 2T 1 SNA • a=3.43 • =0.165 • x -0.014  9.7 a=3.431 =0.16  Band-Merging Transition of Type II through Collision with the Unstable Parent Torus 2CA 1CA • a=3.32 • =0.202 • x 0.033 • a=3.32 • =0.198 • x 0.014

More Related