1 / 15

The principles underpinning accreditation by the UEMS-EACCME

The principles underpinning accreditation by the UEMS-EACCME. Edwin Borman, Christos Pissiotis EACCME Taskforce. Conflict of interest declaration Edwin Borman. Consultant Anaesthetist and Clinical Director (paid) University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK

davis
Télécharger la présentation

The principles underpinning accreditation by the UEMS-EACCME

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The principles underpinningaccreditation bythe UEMS-EACCME Edwin Borman, Christos Pissiotis EACCME Taskforce

  2. Conflict of interest declarationEdwin Borman Consultant Anaesthetist and Clinical Director (paid) University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK Private Anaesthetic Practice (paid) Coventry & Warwickshire Anaesthetists Limited Liability Partnership Educational Consultancy (paid) Wentz-Miller and Associates Individual consultancy work (Ogilvy4D; Pfizer) Medicopolitical representative British Medical Association (BMA) European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS)

  3. Over-arching principles Five for accreditation… Fair Relevant Discriminant Transparent Specific And another two! Evolutionary Developmental

  4. Planned Incremental Change D 99-08 and related documents the basis for UEMS-EACCME accreditation introduction of the process e-Learning 2008/20 (now 2011/20) the introduction of defined standards Live Educational Events 2011/30 (to be implemented) expanding the application of these criteria

  5. Time of application Prospective Retrospective e-Learning L E E

  6. Seven Fields The Learner The Educational Activity The Provider The Activity Developers Ethics Matters An Internal Review Process Process Matters

  7. The Learner Target audience Educational needs The rights of the individual The responsibilities of the individual Confirming learner engagement Feedback

  8. The Educational Activity International Defined objectives Learning methods Educational material Details of the activity Scientific validity and balance Fulfilment of the educational objectives

  9. The Provider Information on the Provider The Provider’s track record

  10. The Activity Developers Organisers Faculty A responsible registered doctor

  11. Ethics matters Conflicts of interest Funding Absence of inappropriate influence Medicolegal, regulatory, industry, legal Free from bias Absence of advertising

  12. An ‘Internal’ Review Process By the Organising Committee Initiated by the Provider

  13. Process matters Application method EACCME decision-making Explicit timescales Amendment; Appeal Outcome Standards for the UEMS-EACCME

  14. Why should we do all of this? For: Doctors ECMECs, confirmed standards Providers confirmation of achievement CME/CPD stimulus for improvement Society transparency and accountability Patients improved education of their doctors

  15. The principles underpinningaccreditation bythe UEMS-EACCME Edwin Borman, Christos Pissiotis EACCME Taskforce

More Related