60 likes | 176 Vues
This document outlines the roles and responsibilities of the consortium leader and members involved in landscape planning initiatives under the COMIFAC framework. It highlights the need for Terms of Reference (ToR) for both leaders and consortium members and proposes by-laws for conflict resolution. Key issues include integrating CARPE landscape planning into local national land use planning (LUP) processes and recommending inclusivity in coordination efforts. Strategies to strengthen national-level COMIFAC coordination and promote landscape planning recognition in macro-zoning are also discussed.
E N D
Group 4: Institutional Collaboration Group members: • Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) • Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) • Didier Dervers (UMD) • Richard Carroll (WWF) • Brian Curran (WCS) • Lisa Steel (WWF) • Bas Huijbregts (WWF) • (IUCN)
Three levels of collaboration • Consortium • Planning Team • Service Providers/Cross-cutters
Consortium Question/Problem: Role/Responsibility of Consortium leader • Need for ToR for Landscape Leader and for ToR for non-lead Consortium members • By-laws including conflict resolution hierarchy • Durability of different structures
Planning Team Problem: • How to integrate CARPE landscape planning into the Plan de Convergence/COMIFAC process? • How to integrate and harmonize CARPE landscape planning into different national LUP initiatives? • Who should participate/who should head planning team?
Recommendations:COMIFAC • Revise ToR of National Coordination to be more inclusive of landscape planning process, stated inclusion in Plan de Convergence • Member of CARPE country team • Link LUP processes to COMIFAC via National Coordinators • Lobby for recognition of landscape planning process (e.g. pilot sites for nat’l level “macro-zonage” processes)
Recommendations (continued) • Lobby for support expansion/renforcement of national level COMIFAC coordination from other partners (French or upcoming german facilitation?)