1 / 8

Defining Domain Vocabularies for Instrument Metadata in Oceanography

This presentation explores the definitions and standards of domain vocabularies relevant to oceanographic instruments. We will discuss the diversity of vocabularies used in this domain, their management status, and whether they are included in formal vocabularies registries. The overview will cover the breadth and depth of topic coverage, assessing if there are any gaps. Additionally, we will examine how existing content standards and tools utilize these vocabularies and provide insights into ongoing projects aimed at their development and management.

daxia
Télécharger la présentation

Defining Domain Vocabularies for Instrument Metadata in Oceanography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instruments Vocabulary Standard(s) • Presentation for IODE-JCOMM Metadata Meeting

  2. Define the Domain ‘Instrument’ • {give a few typical definitions, or just the one we’re using for this talk}

  3. Overview of Domain Vocabularies • are there many vocabularies for this domain? • are any in formal vocabulary registries? • are any existing vocabularies well managed? • topic coverage • is domain coverage wide and without gaps? • is domain coverage deep and disciplined?

  4. Domain Vocabularies In Context • Frameworks • do any content standards leverage these terms? • do any tools leverage these terms? • are there projects to develop or manage these vocabularies? • Usage • are there any mappings of these terms? • how many projects use one of these vocabularies?

  5. Candidate Vocabularies • what are the most well-known, well-used, well-constructed, and well-managed vocabularies?

  6. Name Terms File ID Access Help Cover Agree Usage Mgt Characteristics Key > Id, Name, Description Version, Collection Web, Auto, Ontology Guide,Help, Mail,Supp,Ex Wide, Deep, # Terms/100 Proj.,Comm.,Domain See below #I : #P : #C Org, , Assoc, Nat’l,, Multi. ‘Great’ Example 1 IND VC WAO GHMS W 40 PC 3:2:1 OAN Typical Example 2 IN V W 3 P 4:5:2 O Weak Example 3 N 1 P 1:1:0 Vocabulary Comparison Usage: log(10) Instances : log(2) Projects : Clearinghouses / 2

  7. Winner(s)

  8. Other Comments

More Related