1 / 80

Comprehensive Analysis of School Performance Reports (2011-2012)

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the 2011-2012 school performance data, focusing on the FCAT 2.0 and EOC assessments. It includes trend analyses, raw scores, achievement levels, and comparisons of student performance across various subjects including reading, math, and science. With a focus on accountability for all tested students, the report outlines the criteria for adequate progress, highlighting areas of improvement and requirements for maintaining school grades. This informative document serves as a vital resource for educational leaders and policymakers aiming to enhance student success.

daxia
Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Analysis of School Performance Reports (2011-2012)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leadership Academy on School Performance Reports September 25 to 27, 2012 Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis

  2. Topics

  3. Handouts

  4. NORMS

  5. Http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata

  6. Understanding FCAT 2.0/EOC Reports? Understanding FCAT 2.0 and EOC Reports, Spring 2012

  7. Statewide Assessment

  8. Trend Analysis School Report Accountability Students All Tested Students (2011 Retrofitted FCAT 2.0)

  9. 2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores Reading/Math 1996 SSS 2007 NGSSS Base scale of FCAT Base scale of FCAT 2.0 FCAT 1999 FCAT 2001 2011 FCAT 2.0 Equivalent Scores FCAT 2002 FCAT 2010

  10. FCAT 2.0 Scores, Reading/Math FCAT 2.0 2014 FCAT 2.0 2013 FCAT 2.0 2012 FCAT 2.0 2011 2010-11 Baseline Year (Retrofitted Scores)

  11. Trend Analysis School Report Accountability Students All Tested Students (2011 Retrofitted FCAT 2.0)

  12. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions

  13. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions FCAT FCAT 2.0 and EOC

  14. Trend Analysis School Report Accountability Students All Tested Students (2011 Retrofitted FCAT 2.0)

  15. FCAT 2.0 Reading-Math Scores Raw Score Content Area Scores Developmental Scale Score (DSS)(140 to 302 R: G3-10) (140 to 298 M: G3-8) Achievement Level(1 to 5)

  16. Developmental Scale Score (Reading) G6 G3 G10 Min Max Raw Score 140 Developmental Scale Scores 302 Grade 3 Grade 10

  17. Developmental Scale Score (Math) G6 G3 G8 Min Max Raw Score 140 Developmental Scale Scores 298 Grade 3 Grade 10

  18. Sample Reading Report, Grade 3-4 Total items: 45 41 41 Total items: 45

  19. Sample Math Report, Grade 3-4 32 31

  20. 2011 Algebra I EOC Scores Raw Score Content Scores T-Score Scale(20 to 80) Statewide Comparison by Thirds

  21. 2011 Algebra I EOC Scale Distribution - Statewide

  22. 2012 Algebra 1 EOC Scores Raw Score Algebra Content Scores EOC Scale Score(325 - 475) Achievement Level(1 to 5) Source: FL DOE/Office of Assessment

  23. Algebra I EOC Alg. EOC2014 Alg. EOC 2013 Alg. EOC2012 Alg. EOC 2011 2010-11 Baseline Year (Retrofitted Scores)

  24. Trend Analysis School Report Accountability Students All Tested Students (2011 Retrofitted FCAT 2.0)

  25. Sample Algebra 1 Report 22/54 = 41% 21/54 = 39%

  26. Geometry EOC Scores Raw Score Content Scores T-Score Scale(20 to 80) Statewide Comparison by Thirds

  27. 2012 Geometry EOC Scale Distribution - Statewide

  28. 2012 FCAT 2.0 Science Equivalent Scale Score(100 - 500) Raw Score Content Scores Equivalent Achievement Level(1 to 5)

  29. 2012 Science FCAT 2.0 Scores NGSSS SSS Base scale of FCAT Base scale of FCAT 2.0 FCAT 2003 FCAT 2001 FCAT 2002 FCAT 2.0 Equivalent Scores FCAT 2.0 2012 FCAT 2011

  30. Trend Analysis School Report Accountability Students All Tested Students

  31. Biology EOC Scores Raw Score Content Scores T-Score Scale(20 to 80) Statewide Comparison by Thirds

  32. Trend Analysis School Report

  33. School Performance Grade

  34. Elementary Schools(Text in red [underscored] indicates a new or changed requirement.)

  35. Reading Performance Requirement, 2012-13

  36. Adequate Progress Criteria for the Low25% Made adequate progress Higher than that of prior year by 1 percentage point Made adequate progress Higher than that of prior year by 5 percentage points Made adequate progress and and

  37. To avoid having the school grade reduced: • Suspend the adequate progress requirements for reading and math in 2011-12 Meet Adequate Progress Criteria for the Low25%?

  38. 2012 2013 Yes YES Yes No

  39. 2012 2013 YES No NO Yes

  40. 2012 2013 Yes YES No No

  41. 2012-13 Acceleration component for middle schools on high school EOC assessments (Algebra 1, Geometry, Biology) or Industry Certifications

  42. “held harmless” for the participation measure

  43. Numerator Points

  44. 2012 ALG. EOC and FCAT 2.0 Math Results, Grade 8 with Both Scores

  45. Acceleration Performance

  46. High Schools(Text in red [underscored] indicates a new or changed requirement.)

  47. Changes for High Schools Cohort Graduation Rate Comparisons:

  48. Five-year modified graduation rate component

More Related