1 / 14

Savings

Savings. Prof. Michael Smitka Washington and Lee University. Savings. What determines savings? Motives Present vs future consumption But no specific reason to believe we really trade off consumption today against more goodies tomorrow Need more precise motives! Precautionary motive

dea
Télécharger la présentation

Savings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Savings Prof. Michael Smitka Washington and Lee University

  2. Savings • What determines savings? • Motives • Present vs future consumption • But no specific reason to believe we really trade off consumption today against more goodies tomorrow • Need more precise motives! • Precautionary motive • Rainy day needs are constant? Surely not huge… • Until you get into a severe recession

  3. “Sticky Behavior” • How do we plan our consumption behavior? • Look at those around us… Hence we look backward at how others did?OR: • Project current income into the future… Hence we look backward at how others did? • But all with the aim of providing for the future • With sticky behavior, an unanticipated rise in income thus tends to be saved • In particular, growth raises savings rates • but this is ad hoc / makes light of efforts to optimize

  4. Lifetime or Permanent Income • Sticky behavior assumes we can’t see what’s happening around us, and that non-precautionary savings is unplanned • Alternatively, we deliberately choose to save using (rational?) expectations about the future • We want steady consumption over our lifetime • Though we can jazz the model up to reflect family formation • But income is low when young and old, then: • We dissave (or would like to!) when (i) young or (ii) retired • We save otherwise.

  5. Income vs. Consumption Income (rises then falls) Consumption (steady) Savings Retirement... Dissavings Dissavings 20 80 (death!) 50 30 40 60 70

  6. $ Temp income decline or consumption spurt ===> savings is the margin over which we adjust Income is red line consumption is blue line saving Dissaving age 20 40 60 80

  7. Implications • Savings rise: • When the core savings age bracket is rising as a share of the population • When there are unexpected increases in income • Due for example to a short-term tax rebate • Or when economic growth lifts retirement targets • When (expected) longevity increases • Private savings fall with “social security” • Total savings likely shifts far less

  8. Other interpretations • Another approach is to posit target consumption over the course of a lifetime • These might include: • Buying a house • Funding children’s education • Paying for their wedding • Retirement • In effect, a variation of the “lifetime” model

  9. Advantages of a “target” • Individual targets can shift independent of other movements (income, etc) • It helps in particular to model the impact of changes in asset prices • A rise in housing prices lowers savings if most of the population already owns a house • A fall in the stock market boosts savings • It also seems to fit how people actually plan

  10. Present vs. Future ConsumptionDo interest rates matter? • We trade off in financial markets • S today becomes (1+i)S tomorrow (i=interest) • When “i” rises real wealth rises: we can consume the same amount today and more tomorrow! • From micro theory: • A change in “i” thus has an income effect: we don’t need to save as much to make (say) a down payment. • It also has a substitution effect: the better “price” makes us save more by making future consumption cheaper. • Empirically they cancel: “i” doesn’t affect S

  11. Interest rates: addendum • However, consumption of durables is sensitive to interest rates in the US • Lots of people borrow / buy and then save • Repaying a loan means consumption is less than income • Hence you save to repay a loan • But when interest rates are high, the monthly payment on a mortgage rises steeply • People are priced out of the market • If no one is borrowing, consumption is lower and S • Alternatively, only those repaying loans are left, so S

  12. Japan • These various approaches successfully predict Japan’s rising savings rate during the high growth era of 1955-1973 • The “target” approach helps us understand why savings didn’t fall in 1973-74: inflation eroded assets so families had to redouble their efforts • The “target” approach helps us understand the 1987-91 bubble, too...

  13. Realism: AddendaWe can always add complexity: sample data

  14. This and the previous chart are from Mark Aguiar and Erik Hurst (2008). “Deconstructing Lifecycle Expenditure.” University of Michigan Retirement Research Center, Working Paper WP 2008-173.

More Related